The number of risk factors not at target is associated with cardiovascular risk in a type 2 diabetic population with albuminuria in primary cardiovascular prevention. Post-hoc analysis of the NID-2 trial

Author:

Sasso Ferdinando Carlo,Simeon Vittorio,Galiero Raffaele,Caturano Alfredo,De Nicola Luca,Chiodini Paolo,Rinaldi Luca,Salvatore Teresa,Lettieri Miriam,Nevola Riccardo,Sardu Celestino,Docimo Giovanni,Loffredo Giuseppe,Marfella Raffaele,Adinolfi Luigi Elio,Minutolo Roberto,Amelia U,Acierno C,Calatola P,Carbonara O,Conte G,Corigliano G,Corigliano M,D’Urso R,De Matteo A,De Nicola L,De Rosa N,Del Vecchio E,Di Giovanni G,Gatti A,Gentile S,Gesuè L,Improta L,LampitellaJr A,Lampitella A,Lanzilli A,Lascar N,Masi S,Mattei P,Mastrilli V,Memoli P,Minutolo R,Nasti R,Pagano A,Pentangelo M,Pisa E,Rossi E,Sasso F C,Sorrentino S,Torella R,Troise R,Trucillo P,Turco A A,Turco S,Zibella F,Zirpoli L,

Abstract

Abstract Background Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial that demonstrated that multifactorial intensive treatment reduces Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) and overall mortality versus standard of care in type 2 diabetic subjects with albuminuria and no history of cardiovascular disease. Aim of the present post-hoc analysis of NID- 2 study is to evaluate whether the number of risk factors on target associates with patient outcomes. Methods Intervention phase lasted four years and subsequent follow up for survival lasted 10 years. To the aim of this post-hoc analysis, the whole population has been divided into 3 risk groups: 0–1 risk factor (absent/low); 2–3 risk factors (intermediate); 4 risk factors (high). Primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal MACEs, the secondary endpoint was all-cause death at the end of the follow-up phase. Results Absent/low risk group included 166 patients (52.4%), intermediate risk group 128 (40.4%) and high-risk group 23 (7.3%). Cox model showed a significant higher risk of MACE and death in the high-risk group after adjustment for confounding variables, including treatment arm (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04–3.52, P = 0.038 and 1.96, 95%CI 1.02–3.8, P = 0,045, respectively, vs absent/low risk group). Conclusions This post-hoc analysis of the NID-2 trial indicates that the increase in the number of risk factors at target correlates with better cardiovascular-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference28 articles.

1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies [published correction appears in Lancet. 2010 Sep 18;376(9745):958. Hillage, H L [corrected to Hillege, H L]]. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9

2. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(2):434–44. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.2.434 (PMID: 8432214).

3. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 1;41(45):4317. PMID: 31497854.

4. Sasso FC, Pafundi PC, Simeon V et al. NID-2 Study Group Investigators. Efficacy and durability of multifactorial intervention on mortality and MACEs: a randomized clinical trial in type-2 diabetic kidney disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01343-1. PMID: 34271948; PMCID: PMC8285851.

5. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(Suppl 1): S4-S36. Erratum in: Diabetes Care. 2005 Apr;28(4):990. PMID: 15618112.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3