Trends in prognosis and use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease

Abstract

Abstract Objective To explore trends in prognosis and use of glucose-lowering drugs (GLD) in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD). Research design and methods All patients with diabetes and CAD undergoing a coronary angiography between 2010 and 2021 according to the Swedish Angiography and Angioplasty Registry were included. Information on GLD (dispended 6 months before or after coronary angiography) was collected from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry. Data on major cardiovascular events (MACE; mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure) through December 2021 were obtained from national registries. Cox proportional survival analysis was used to assess outcomes where cardioprotective GLD (any of Sodium Glucose Lowering Transport 2 receptor inhibitors [SGLT2i] and Glucagon Like Peptide Receptor Agonists [GLP-1 RA]) served as a reference. Results Among all patients (n = 38,671), 31% had stable CAD, and 69% suffered an acute myocardial infarction. Mean age was 69 years, 67% were male, and 81% were on GLD. The use of cardioprotective GLD increased rapidly in recent years (2016–2021; 7–47%) and was more common in younger patients (66 vs. 68 years) and men (72.9% vs. 67.1%) than other GLD. Furthermore, compared with other GLD, the use of cardioprotective GLD was more common in patients with a less frequent history of heart failure (5.0% vs. 6.8%), myocardial infarction (7.7% vs. 10.5%) and chronic kidney disease (3.7% vs. 5.2%). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for MACE was greater in patients on other GLD than in those on cardioprotective GLD (1.10; 1.03–1.17, p = 0.004). Trend analyses for the years 2010–2019 revealed improved one-year MACE in patients with diabetes and CAD (year 2019 vs. 2010; 0.90; 0.81-1.00, p = 0.045), while 1-year mortality was unchanged. Conclusions The prescription pattern of diabetes medication is changing quickly in patients with diabetes and CAD; however, there are worrying signals of inefficient use prioritizing cardioprotective GLD to younger and healthier individuals at lower cardiovascular risk. Despite this, there are improving trends in 1-year morbidity.