Impact of telemedical management on hospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with diabetes: a post-hoc subgroup analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial
-
Published:2024-06-12
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1475-2840
-
Container-title:Cardiovascular Diabetology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cardiovasc Diabetol
Author:
Koehler Friedrich,Koehler Johanna,Bramlage Peter,Vettorazzi Eik,Wegscheider Karl,Lezius Susanne,Spethmann Sebastian,Iakoubov Roman,Vijayan Anjaly,Winkler Sebastian,Melzer Christoph,Schütt Katharina,Dessapt-Baradez Cécile,Paar W.Dieter,Koehler Kerstin,Müller-Wieland Dirk
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The TIM-HF2 study demonstrated that remote patient management (RPM) in a well-defined heart failure (HF) population reduced the percentage of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospital admissions or all-cause death during 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio 0.80) and all-cause mortality alone (HR 0.70). Higher rates of hospital admissions and mortality have been reported in HF patients with diabetes compared with HF patients without diabetes. Therefore, in a post-hoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 study, we investigated the efficacy of RPM in HF patients with diabetes.
Methods
TIM-HF2 study was a randomized, controlled, unmasked (concealed randomization), multicentre trial, performed in Germany between August 2013 and May 2018. HF-Patients in NYHA class II/III who had a HF-related hospital admission within the previous 12 months, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, and were randomized to usual care with or without added RPM and followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or due to death of any cause. This post-hoc analysis included 707 HF patients with diabetes.
Results
In HF patients with diabetes, RPM reduced the percentage of days lost due to cardiovascular hospitalization or death compared with usual care (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.90), and the rate of all-cause mortality alone (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.85). RPM was also associated with an improvement in quality of life (mean difference in change in global score of Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MLHFQ): − 3.4, 95% CI − 6.2 to − 0.6).
Conclusion
These results support the use of RPM in HF patients with diabetes.
Clinical trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01878630.
Funder
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Scholte NTB, Gurgoze MT, Aydin D, Theuns D, Manintveld OC, Ronner E, Boersma E, de Boer RA, van der Boon RMA, Brugts JJ. Telemonitoring for heart failure: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:2911–26. 2. Koehler F, Koehler K, Deckwart O, Prescher S, Wegscheider K, Kirwan BA, Winkler S, Vettorazzi E, Bruch L, Oeff M, Zugck C, Doerr G, Naegele H, Stork S, Butter C, Sechtem U, Angermann C, Gola G, Prondzinsky R, Edelmann F, Spethmann S, Schellong SM, Schulze PC, Bauersachs J, Wellge B, Schoebel C, Tajsic M, Dreger H, Anker SD, Stangl K. Efficacy of telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure (TIM-HF2): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, unmasked trial. Lancet. 2018;392:1047–57. 3. Pandey A, Khan MS, Patel KV, Bhatt DL, Verma S. Predicting and preventing heart failure in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023. 4. MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Varyani F, Ostergren J, Michelson EL, Young JB, Solomon SD, Granger CB, Swedberg K, Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Investigators C. Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1377–85. 5. Lehrke M, Marx N. Diabetes Mellitus and Heart failure. Am J Med. 2017;130:S40–50.
|
|