Effect of saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg on glycemic control, lipid profile and cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 56-week, randomized, double blind, phase 3 study (PRESS XII study)
-
Published:2020-06-19
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:
-
ISSN:1475-2840
-
Container-title:Cardiovascular Diabetology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cardiovasc Diabetol
Author:
Krishnappa ManjunathORCID, Patil Kishor, Parmar Krupi, Trivedi Purav, Mody Nirali, Shah Chintan, Faldu Khushboo, Maroo Sanjay, Desai Piyush, Fatania Kamlesh, Murthy Satyanarayan, Balamurugan R., Agarwal Manish, Singh K. P., Kalra G. S., Khandelwal Vipul, Singwala Ashish, Thacker Hemant, Tulle Rahul, Rao Harish, Kumbla Mukund, Singh Parminder, Khatri Ashok, Agrawal Sumit, Sarkar R. N., Agarwal Dinesh, Bhatia Girish, Agarwal R. P., Kumar Surender, Vamsi Krishna P. R., Ajmani Ajay Kumar, Asalkar Amit, Basu Indraneel, Chatterjee Sudip, Pavithran Vinod Kumar, Das Rupam, Dharmadhikari Aniruddha, Vardhan Vikram, Madusudhan Babu M., Sengupta Nilanjan, Abkari Srirang, Harikrishna R., Chovatia Rashmi, Parmar Deven,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The potential for PPAR agonists to positively affect risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is of persistent attention. The PRESS XII study primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar (2 mg and 4 mg) as compared to pioglitazone 30 mg on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
In this randomized double-blind study, patients with T2DM [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5%] were enrolled from 39 sites in India. Patients received once-daily doses of either saroglitazar or pioglitazone (1:1:1 allocation ratio) for a total of 24 weeks. Patients were continued in a double blind extension period for an additional 32 weeks. Efficacy evaluations of glycemic parameters [HbA1c (Primary endpoint at week 24), FPG and PPG] and other lipid parameters (TG, LDL-C, VLDL-C, HDL-C, TC, Non HDL-C, Apo A1 and Apo B) were conducted at week 12, 24 and 56 and compared to the baseline levels. The efficacy analyses were performed by using paired t-test and ANCOVA model.
Results
A total of 1155 patients were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics were similar between the three treatment groups. The within group mean (± SD) change in HbA1c (%) from baseline of the saroglitazar (2 mg and 4 mg) and pioglitazone treatment groups at week 24 were: − 1.38 ± 1.99 for saroglitazar 2 mg; − 1.47 ± 1.92 for saroglitazar 4 mg and − 1.41 ± 1.86 for pioglitazone, respectively. Statistically significant reduction from baseline in HbA1c was observed in each treatment group at week 24 with p-value < 0.016. There was a significant reduction in TG, LDL-C, VLDL-C, TC and Non HDL-C with a significant increase in HDL-C from baseline levels (< 0.016). Most of the AE’s were ‘mild’ to ‘moderate’ in severity and were resolved by the completion of the study.
Conclusions
Saroglitazar effectively improved glycemic control and lipid parameters over 56 weeks in patients of T2DM receiving background metformin therapy and has a promising potential to reduce the cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients.
Trial registration CTRI/2015/09/006203, dated 22/09/2015
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference53 articles.
1. Kendall DM, Rubin CJ, Mohideen P, Ledeine JM, Belder R, Gross J, Norwood P, O’Mahony M, Sall K, Sloan G, Roberts A. Improvement of glycemic control, triglycerides, and hdl cholesterol levels with muraglitazar, a dual (α/γ) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activator, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a double-blind, randomized, pioglitazone-comparative study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(5):1016–23. 2. Bays H, McElhattan J, Bryzinski BS. A double-blind, randomised trial of tesaglitazar versus pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2007;4(3):181–93. 3. IDF Diabetes Atlas, Ninth edition; 2019. https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/2019/IDF_Atlas_9th_Edition_2019.pdf. Accessed on 07 Mar 2020. 4. Unoki H, Takahashi A, Kawaguchi T, Hara K, Horikoshi M, Andersen G, Ng DP, Holmkvist J, Borch-Johnsen K, Jørgensen T, Sandbæk A. SNPs in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in East Asian and European populations. Nat Genet. 2008;40(9):1098. 5. Tabassum R, Chauhan G, Dwivedi OP, Mahajan A, Jaiswal A, Kaur I, Bandesh K, Singh T, Mathai BJ, Pandey Y, Chidambaram M. Genome-wide association study for type 2 diabetes in Indians identifies a new susceptibility locus at 2q21. Diabetes. 2013;62(3):977–86.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|