Abstract
Abstract
Background
Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to its initial state before exposure to a disturbance. Resilient livestock are desired because of their improved health and increased economic profit. Genetic improvement of resilience may also lead to trade-offs with production traits. Recently, resilience indicators based on longitudinal data have been suggested, but they need further evaluation to determine whether they are indeed predictive of improved resilience, such as disease resilience. This study investigated different resilience indicators based on deviations between expected and observed egg production (EP) by exploring their genetic parameters, their possible trade-offs with production traits, and their relationships with antibody traits in chickens.
Methods
Egg production in a nucleus breeding herd environment based on 1-week-, 2-week-, or 3-week-intervals of two purebred chicken lines, a white egg-laying (33,825 chickens) and a brown egg-laying line (34,397 chickens), were used to determine deviations between observed EP and expected average batch EP, and between observed EP and expected individual EP. These deviations were used to calculate three types of resilience indicators for two life periods of each individual: natural logarithm-transformed variance (ln(variance)), skewness, and lag-one autocorrelation (autocorrelation) of deviations from 25 to 83 weeks of age and from 83 weeks of age to end of life. Then, we estimated their genetic correlations with EP traits and with two antibody traits.
Results
The most promising resilience indicators were those based on 1-week-intervals, as they had the highest heritability estimates (0.02–0.12) and high genetic correlations (above 0.60) with the same resilience indicators based on longer intervals. The three types of resilience indicators differed genetically from each other, which indicates that they possibly capture different aspects of resilience. Genetic correlations of the resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals with EP traits were favorable or zero, which means that trade-off effects were marginal. The resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals also showed no genetic correlations with the antibody traits, which suggests that they are not informative for improved immunity or vice versa in the nucleus environment.
Conclusions
This paper gives direction towards the evaluation and implementation of resilience indicators, i.e. to further investigate resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals, in breeding programs for selecting genetically more resilient layer chickens.
Funder
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Earth and Life Sciences
SusAn, an ERA-Net co-funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Animal Genetic Division of INRAE
Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Colditz IG, Hine BC. Resilience in farm animals: biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2016;56:1961–83.
2. Berghof TVL, Poppe M, Mulder HA. Opportunities to improve resilience in animal breeding programs. Front Genet. 2019;9:692.
3. Knap PW, Doeschl-Wilson A. Why breed disease-resilient livestock, and how? Genet Sel Evol. 2020;52:60.
4. Knap PW. Voluntary feed intake and pig breeding. In: Torrallardona D, Roura EA, editors. Voluntary feed intake in pigs. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2009. p. 11–33.
5. Doeschl-Wilson AB, Villanueva B, Kyriazakis I. The first step toward genetic selection for host tolerance to infectious pathogens: obtaining the tolerance phenotype through group estimates. Front Genet. 2012;3:265.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献