Author:
Awod Bin Hassan Saeed,Ali F Alshadidi Abdulkhaliq,Ibrahim N Aldosari Lujain,Heboyan Artak,S Saini Ravinder
Abstract
Abstract
Background and objectives
Polyvinyl ether siloxane (PVES) possesses ideal characteristics for making precise and accurate dental impressions. PVES dimensional stability owes to its better polymeric properties derived from its parent materials poly ethers and polyvinyl siloxanes. As recommended use of chemical disinfecting agents is getting more popular, there is a growing concern associated with the effect of disinfectants on PVES dimensional stability. This study was aimed to understand the PVES behavior when subjected to chemical disinfectants.
Materials and methodology
The data was collected from research studies retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed using MeSH terms of keywords “vinyl polyether siloxane AND Disinfection” or (Vinyl polyether siloxane OR polyvinyl siloxane ether OR PVES) AND (disinfectant OR disinfection)” without any restriction to publication date. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis) directions were observed during the data collection, screening of studies, and meta-analysis. The primary data were retrieved, and batch exported from databases using Harzing’s Publish or Perish software; primary analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel, while statistical analysis for effect size, two-tailed p-values, and heterogeneity among studies was performed using Meta Essentials. The effect size was calculated using Hedge’s g values at the 95% confidence level using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was measured using the Cochrane Q and I2.
Results and conclusion
Dental impressions made from the PVES elastomeric impression materials showed no significant changes in dimensional stability. Immersion in the chemical disinfectant for 10 min was associated with clinically irrelevant changes in the dimensions of the PVES impressions. Disinfection with sodium hypochlorite was associated with clinically significant changes in dimensions, with a two-tailed p-value of 0.049. Disinfection with 2–2.5% glutaraldehyde solution was not associated with any significant dimensional variability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Singer L, Habib SI, Shalaby HEA, Saniour SH, Bourauel C. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1).
2. Singer L, Bourauel C, Habib SI, Shalaby HEA, Saniour SH. Tear strength and elastic recovery of new generation hybrid elastomeric impression material: A comparative study. BMC Res Notes. 2022 Dec 1;15(1).
3. Varvara G, Sinjari B, Bernardi S, Turkyilmaz I, Malvezzi V, Piattelli M, Caputi S. Comparative surface detail reproduction for elastomeric impression materials: Study on reproducibility performance. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):161-9.
4. Mohammed DH, Fatalla AA, Jani GH. Comparison of Some Mechanical and Physical Properties of three Types of Impression Materials with Different Dental Implant Angulations. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal. 2018 Sep 21;11(3):1359-68.
5. Chauhan D, Singh D, Jadhav D, Swarup S, Ahuja S, Soni S. Assessment of accuracy of different materials used in impressions for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Molecular & Clin Med. 2021 Feb;4(09):3072–6.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献