Author:
Zahw Esraa Khaled,Albelasy Nehal Fouad,Fouda Ahmed Maher
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many indices have been suggested to help orthodontists in predicting the ideal dental arch width. One of these was Pont’s index which was established by Pont. He suggested equations to predict the ideal maxillary dental arch width (interpremolar and intermolar) from the combined mesiodistal width of the maxillary incisors. This study aimed to test the applicability of Pont’s index as an orthodontic diagnostic tool in Egyptian population and to compare the results with those obtained from studies of different ethnic subjects.
Methods
This study was performed using dental casts of 184 Egyptian individuals (82 males and 102 females; age range, 19–24 years). The casts were divided into 46 casts with normal occlusion, 46 casts with class I, 46 casts with class II and 46 casts with class III malocclusion, according to Angle’s classification. Alginate impressions were taken for all patients and poured immediately using dental plaster. The real models were transformed into digital models using three-dimensional laser scanner to allow digital model analysis. Predicted arch widths were calculated using Pont’s equations. The predicted values were compared to the measured values.
Results
Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) (absolute agreement) between measured and predicted arch widths was determined. Poor absolute agreement was found between measured arch width values and the corresponding values calculated according to Pont’s index.
Conclusion
According to the results of this study, Pont’s index is not a reliable method for predicting the ideal dental arch widths in Egyptian populations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Hagg E, Yip A, Rabie A. The orthodontic treatment need and demand of young Chinese adults vs children. Chin J Dent Res. 2002;4(4):7–15.
2. Hensel E, Born G, Körber V, Altvater T, Gesch D. Prevalence of defined symptoms of malocclusion among probands enrolled in the study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) in the age group from 20 to 49 years. J Orofac Orthopedics/Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopädie. 2003;64(3):157–66.
3. Betts NJ, Vanarsdall RL, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthod. 1995;10(2):75–96.
4. de Silva Fo OG, Boas CV, Capelozza. LFO. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentitions: a cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1991;100(2):171-9.
5. Sawchuk D, Currie K, Vich ML, Palomo JM, Flores-Mir C. Diagnostic methods for assessing maxillary skeletal and dental transverse deficiencies: a systematic review. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46(5):331–42.