Author:
Kokubun Katsutoshi,Nakajima Kei,Yamamoto Kei,Akashi Yoshihiko,Matsuzaka Kenichi
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Liquid-based cytology is highly useful in oral cytology. However, there are only few reports on the accuracy of this method. The current study aimed to compare oral liquid-based cytological and histological diagnoses and to evaluate items that should be considered in oral cytological diagnosis for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods
We included 653 patients who underwent both oral cytological and histological examinations. Data on sex, specimen collection region, cytological and histological diagnoses, and histological images were reviewed.
Results
The overall male-to-female ratio was 1:1.18. The tongue was the most common specimen collection region, followed by the gingiva and buccal mucosa. The most common cytological examination result was negative (66.8%), followed by doubtful (22.7%) and positive (10.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cytological diagnosis were 69%, 75%, 38%, and 92%, respectively. Approximately 8.3% of patients with a negative cytological diagnosis had a histological diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, 86.1% of histopathologic images of cytology-negative squamous cell carcinomas exhibited well-differentiated keratinocytes lacking atypia on the surface. The remaining patients developed recurrence, or they had low cell counts.
Conclusion
Liquid-based cytology is useful in screening oral cancer. However, a cytological diagnosis of superficial-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma is occasionally inconsistent with the histological diagnosis. Therefore, histological and cytological examinations should be performed if tumor-like lesions are suspected clinically.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer. J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.
2. El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg P. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017.
3. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan. (2020) Vital Statistics of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. In: Cancer Statistics. https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/data/dl/index.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2022
4. Moore K, Ford P, Farah C. Support needs and quality of life in oral cancer: a systematic review. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2014;12:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12051.
5. della Vella F, Lauritano D, Lajolo C, Lucchese A, Di Stasio D, Contaldo M, Serpico R, Petruzzi M. The Pseudolesions of the oral mucosa: Differential diagnosis and related systemic conditions. Appl Sci. 2019;9:2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122412.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献