Author:
Alhuwaish Hessah A.,Almoammar Khalid A.,Fakhouri Abdulaziz S.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Occlusal cant (OC) is a malocclusion trait that lacks accurate clinical assessment methods. The occlusal canting identifying tool (OCIT) was invented and patented as a clinical tool to accurately identify and quantify the degree of maxillary OC. This study aimed to 1) develop a prototype of the OCIT, 2) verify the functionality of the OCIT and 3) assess the validity and reliability of the OCIT.
Materials and methods
A patented OCIT design was revised, and the dimensions were finalized, followed by a three-dimensional conceptual prototype design that was reviewed and approved by the inventors. Verification was performed using a digital angle gauge to determine the accuracy of the bubble level as well as the angle between the bite plate and the protractor. For laboratory validation, 40 orthodontists measured the simulated OC at (0°, 2°, 4°, 6° and 8°) on five phantom heads using the OCIT. A reliability assessment of the tool was performed in three occasions by one orthodontist using the same laboratory settings.
Results
The OCIT was prototyped from a medical-grade stainless steel alloy (316 L). Verification assessment revealed that the accuracy error of the bubble level (0.316° ± 0.028°) was statistically significant but clinically insignificant, while that of the angle between the bite plate and protractor (0.100° ± 0.050°) was statistically insignificant. Validation assessment showed high validity of the OCIT with no statistically significant difference between the OCIT and the reference values, having more errors in identifying smaller OC degrees compared to larger OC degrees. The intraclass correlation coefficient indicated the high reliability of the OCIT.
Conclusion
The OCIT was verified and proven to be a valid and reliable clinical tool that accurately evaluates the degree of OC.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Perrott DH, Umeda H, Kaban LB. Costochondral graft construction/reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit: long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23(6 Pt 1):321–8.
2. Cho JH, et al. Correlations of frontal lip-line canting with craniofacial morphology and muscular activity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(3):278–e7.
3. Susarla SM, Dodson TB, Kaban LB. Measurement and interpretation of a maxillary occlusal cant in the frontal plane. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(12):2498–502.
4. Cheong YW, Lo LJ. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management. Chang Gung Med J. 2011;34(4):341–51.
5. Erickson K, Bell W, Goldsmith D. Analytical model surgery. In: Bell WH, editor. Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992. p. 156–8.