Author:
Hamouda Aliaa Abdelsalam,El-Habashy Laila M.,Khalil Amani
Abstract
Abstract
Background
One of the main goals for pediatric dentists is to offer a painless anesthesia experience. Laser photobiomodulation is among the suggested strategies to decrease injection pain. So, this study aimed to assess the impact of laser photobiomodulation on local anesthesia (LA) injection pain in children and its effect on the efficacy of LA during pulpotomy and SSC procedures.
Methods
The research was carried out as a randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel group design. It involved 64 cooperative healthy children, age range from 5 to 7 years, each having at least one maxillary molar indicated for pulpotomy. Children were randomly allocated to one of the two groups based on the pre-anesthetic tissue management technique used: test group received laser photobiomodulation, while control group received topical anesthetic gel. Pain during injection, pulpotomy, and SSC procedures was assessed using physiological measures (Heart Rate (HR)), subjective evaluation (modified Face-Pain‐Scale (FPS), and objective analysis (Sound‐Eye‐Motor scale (SEM)).
Results
A total of 64 children with mean age 6.23 ± 0.78 participated in this research. The mean HR scores were significantly lower in the laser PBM group during buccal and palatal infiltration injections. The SEM mean scores were significantly lower in the laser PBM group during both injections. For the FPS scale, the number of children who recorded satisfaction during injection was significantly higher in laser PBM group. There was no statistically significant difference in mean HR as well as in SEM and FPS scores between the two groups during pulpotomy and SSC procedures. Comparisons between the two study groups were performed using independent samples t- and Mann-Whitney U tests. Significance was set at p value < 0.05.
Conclusion
Laser photobiomodulation is a promising non-pharmacological pre-anesthetic tissue management technique in children that offered less painful injection compared to topical anesthetic gel without compromising the effectiveness of LA.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05861154. Registered on 16/5/2023.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Mohiuddin I, Setty J, Srinivasan Ii. Desai. JA. Topical application of local anaesthetic gel vs ice in pediatric patients for infiltration anaesthesia. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4:12934–40.
2. Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ, Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33:183–4.
3. Sun G, Tunér J. Low-level laser therapy in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:1061–76.
4. Gavish L, Hoffer O, Rabin N, Halak M, Shkilevich S, Shayovitz Y, et al. Microcirculatory Response to Photobiomodulation—Why some respond and others do not: a randomized controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52:863–72.
5. Rogatkin DA, Dunaev AV. Stimulation of blood microcirculation at low level laser therapy: monitoring tools and preliminary data. JMRD. 2014;3:100–6.