CariesCare International adapted for the pandemic in children: Caries OUT multicentre single-group interventional study protocol
-
Published:2021-07-01
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6831
-
Container-title:BMC Oral Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Oral Health
Author:
Martignon StefaniaORCID, Cortes Andrea, Douglas Gail V. A., Newton J. Timothy, Pitts Nigel B., Avila Viviana, Usuga-Vacca Margarita, Gamboa Luis F., Deery Christopher, Abreu-Placeres Ninoska, Bonifacio Clarisa, Braga Mariana M., Carletto-Körber Fabiana, Castro Patricia, P. Cerezo María, Chavarría Nathaly, Cifuentes Olga L., Echeverri Beatriz, Jácome-Liévano Sofía, Kuzmina Irina, Lara J. Sebastián, Manton David, Martínez-Mier E. Angeles, Melo Paulo, Muller-Bolla Michèle, Ochoa Emilia, Osorio Jesús R., Ramos Ketty, Sanabria Angie F., Sanjuán Johanna, San-Martín Magdalena, Squassi Aldo, Velasco A. Karina, Villena Rita, Zandona Andrea Ferreira, Beltrán Edgar O.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Comprehensive caries care has shown effectiveness in controlling caries progression and improving health outcomes by controlling caries risk, preventing initial-caries lesions progression, and patient satisfaction. To date, the caries-progression control effectiveness of the patient-centred risk-based CariesCare International (CCI) system, derived from ICCMS™ for the practice (2019), remains unproven. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a previously planned multi-centre RCT shifted to this “Caries OUT” study, aiming to assess in a single-intervention group in children, the caries-control effectiveness of CCI adapted for the pandemic with non-aerosols generating procedures (non-AGP) and reducing in-office time.
Methods
In this 1-year multi-centre single-group interventional trial the adapted-CCI effectiveness will be assessed in one single group in terms of tooth-surface level caries progression control, and secondarily, individual-level caries progression control, children’s oral-health behaviour change, parents’ and dentists’ process acceptability, and costs exploration. A sample size of 258 3–5 and 6–8 years old patients was calculated after removing half from the previous RCT, allowing for a 25% dropout, including generally health children (27 per centre). The single-group intervention will be the adapted-CCI 4D-cycle caries care, with non-AGP and reduced in-office appointments’ time. A trained examiner per centre will conduct examinations at baseline, at 5–5.5 months (3 months after basic management), 8.5 and 12 months, assessing the child’s CCI caries risk and oral-health behaviour, visually staging and assessing caries-lesions severity and activity without air-drying (ICDAS-merged Epi); fillings/sealants; missing/dental-sepsis teeth, and tooth symptoms, synthetizing together with parent and external-trained dental practitioner (DP) the patient- and tooth-surface level diagnoses and personalised care plan. DP will deliver the adapted-CCI caries care. Parents’ and dentists’ process acceptability will be assessed via Treatment-Evaluation-Inventory questionnaires, and costs in terms of number of appointments and activities. Twenty-one centres in 13 countries will participate.
Discussion
The results of Caries OUT adapted for the pandemic will provide clinical data that could help support shifting the caries care in children towards individualised oral-health behaviour improvement and tooth-preserving care, improving health outcomes, and explore if the caries progression can be controlled during the pandemic by conducting non-AGP and reducing in-office time.
Trial registration: Retrospectively-registered-ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04666597-07/12/2020: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000AGM4&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00019IE&ts=2&cx=uwje3h. Protocol-version 2: 27/01/2021.
Funder
IADR Regional Development Program - Latin American Region
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Dentistry
Reference49 articles.
1. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272. 2. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):51–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2. 3. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17030. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.30. 4. Curtis B, Evans RW, Sbaraini A, Schwarz E. The monitor practice programme: is non-invasive management of dental caries in private practice effective? Aust Dent J. 2008;53(4):306–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00071.x. 5. Vermaire JH, Van Loveren C, Brouwer WBF, Krol M. Value for money: economic evaluation of two different caries prevention programmes compared with standard care in a randomized controlled trial. Caries Res. 2014;48(3):244–53. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356859.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|