Author:
Elkady Mahmoud,Abdelhakim Safaa Helmy,Riad Mona
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This clinical study was conducted aiming to evaluate the impact of repeated preheating of bulk-fill resin composite on postoperative hypersensitivity.
Methods
A total of 105 eligible, consenting adults were recruited. Patients had posterior teeth suffering from proximal decay with no signs of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were prepared for Class II restorations and restored with bulk-fill resin composite. Patients were randomized into three groups of 35 patients according to the number of preheating cycles for the resin composite syringe used; group I: no preheating; control group at room temperature, group II: Resin composite preheated once, and group III: Resin composite preheated ten cycles. Patients were assessed for postoperative dentin hypersensitivity using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at three-time intervals: day one, one week and by the end of one month after restorative treatment. Statistical analysis was performed; ANOVA with a single factor was used to test for significance at a p value ≤ 0.05. For nonparametric data, the Kruskal‒Wallis test was used to compare the three testing groups. Friedman’s test was used to study the changes within each group. Dunn’s test was used for pairwise comparisons when the Kruskal‒Wallis test or Friedman’s test was significant.
Results
The scores of the three groups through the three time intervals were almost zero except for the first day where VAS scores were recorded with maximum score of 3 for groups I and II. Groups II and III; there was no statistically significant change in hypersensitivity scores by time with P-values 0.135 and 0.368, respectively. However, for group I there was a significant difference from VAS score recorded on first day and the two following time intervals.
Conclusion
The repeated preheating cycles of bulk-fill resin composite prior to curing had no adverse effect on the patients regarding postoperative dentin hypersensitivity. This information could be of utmost significance, as the same resin composite syringe can undergo numerous preheating cycles clinically before it is completely consumed with the advantage of improvement on the handling properties.
Trial registration
The protocol of the current study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, with the identification number NCT05289479 on 21/03/2022. All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Egypt, under the approval number 73/440 on 11/09/2020.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dentistry (Shiraz Iran). 2013;14(3):136–45.
2. Berkowitz G, Spielman H, Matthews A, Vena D, Craig R, Curro F, et al. Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) network. Part 1. Compendium Continuing Educ Dentistry (Jamesburg NJ: 1995). 2013;34(3):e44–52.
3. Porto I. Post-operative sensitivity on direct resin composite restorations: clinical practice guidelines. Indian J Restor Dentistry. 2012;1:1–12.
4. de Oliveira ILM, Hanzen TA, de Paula AM, Perdigão J, Montes MAJR, Loguercio AD, et al. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2022;117:103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918.
5. Costa T, Rezende M, Sakamoto A, Bittencourt B, Dalzochio P, Loguercio AD, et al. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement technique on postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2017;42(2):143–54. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-010-C.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献