Author:
López Sacristán H.,del Canto Pingarrón M.,Alobera Gracia M.A.,de Elío Oliveros J.,Díaz Pedrero R.,Seco-Calvo J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The healing process after tooth removal involves bone remodelling which implies some loss of alveolar bone volume. Among materials proposed for minimising this remodelling and preserving the bone, autologous dental tissue is a promising option, but more data are needed. In this context, we evaluated size and density changes using cone beam computed tomography in autologous dental material (ADM)-preserved sockets compared to controls, and assessed biological responses by histological analysis.
Methods
A split-mouth study was conducted including 22 patients, who underwent removal of ≥ 2 single-rooted teeth with intact sockets, assigning one socket to the experimental group which received ADM for alveolar preservation and another to the control group, which only underwent blood clot stabilisation. Cone beam computed tomography was performed postoperatively (week 0) and at weeks 8 and 16 to assess socket size and bone density. Histological analysis was carried out on trephine biopsies taken (Ø4 × 4.5 mm) from the experimental group.
Results
Less horizontal shrinkage was observed in the ADM group, especially at week 16 considering the group-by-time interaction for the following variables: difference in height between the lingual and buccal alveolar crests (-1.00; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.28 – -1.73), and half-widths, measured as the distance from the long axis of the missing tooth to the buccal alveolar crest at 1 mm (-0.61; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.18 – -1.04) and at 3 mm (-0.56; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.15 – -0.97) below the crest, with mean decreases of 1.07 and 2.14 mm in height difference, 0.66 and 1.32 mm in half-width at 1 mm and 0.43 and 1.02 mm in half-width at 3 mm in ADM and control groups respectively. Densitometry analysis showed higher bone densities in Hounsfield units in the ADM group considering all factors analysed regardless of time point and socket third (coronal, middle, or apical). Histologically, there were no signs of inflammation or foreign body reaction, and dentin particles were surrounded by and in close contact with bone tissue.
Conclusion
These results add to the evidence that dentin can be used successfully as a material for alveolar socket preservation, given its desirable mechanical and biological properties, and warrant larger studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212–8.
2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2003;23:313–23.
3. Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46 Suppl 21:195–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13057. Erratum in: J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(1):129. PMID: 30623987.
4. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):84–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12170. PMID: 28000278.
5. Kalsi AS, Kalsi JS, Bassi S. Alveolar ridge preservation: why, when and how. Br Dent J. 2019;227(4):264–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0647-2. PMID: 31444438.