Author:
Liu Yiting,Sun Jing,Zhang Caiqi,Wu Yi,Ma Siyuan,Li Xuechun,Wu Xiaoshan,Gao Qingping
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to analyse the differences in the phenotypes of missing teeth between a pair of brothers with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) and to investigate the underlying mechanism by comparing the mutated gene loci between the brothers with whole-exome sequencing.
Methods
The clinical data of the patients and their mother were collected, and genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. By Whole-exome sequencing filtered for a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤0.05 non-synonymous single-nucleotide variations and insertions/deletions variations in genes previously associated with tooth agenesis, and variations considered as potentially pathogenic were assessed by SIFT, Polyphen-2, CADD and ACMG. Sanger sequencing was performed to detect gene variations. The secondary and tertiary structures of the mutated proteins were predicted by PsiPred 4.0 and AlphaFold 2.
Results
Both brothers were clinically diagnosed with HED, but the younger brother had more teeth than the elder brother. An EDA variation (c.878 T > G) was identified in both brothers. Additionally, compound heterozygous variations of WNT10A (c.511C > T and c.637G > A) were identified in the elder brother. Digenic variations in EDA (c.878 T > G) and WNT10A (c.511C > T and c.637G > A) in the same patient have not been reported previously. The secondary structure of the variant WNT10A protein showed changes in the number and position of α-helices and β-folds compared to the wild-type protein. The tertiary structure of the WNT10A variant and molecular simulation docking showed that the site and direction where WNT10A binds to FZD5 was changed.
Conclusions
Compound heterozygous WNT10A missense variations may exacerbate the number of missing teeth in HED caused by EDA variation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference83 articles.
1. Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. Diseases of the tooth: the genetic and molecular basis of inherited anomalies affecting the dentition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev –Develop Biol. 2013;2(2):183–212.
2. Chhabra N, Goswami M, Chhabra A. Genetic basis of dental agenesis - molecular genetics patterning clinical dentistry. Med Oral Patol Oral Y Cirugia Bucal. 2014;19(2):E112–9.
3. Salama FS, Abdel-Megid FY. Hypodontia of primary and permanent teeth in a sample of Saudi children. Egyptian dental j. 1994;40(1):625–32.
4. De Coster PJ, Marks LA, Martens LC, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38(1):1–17.
5. Zhang J, Liu HC, Lyu X, Shen GH, Deng XX, Li WR, Zhang XX, Feng HL. Prevalence of tooth agenesis in adolescent Chinese populations with or without orthodontics. Chin j dental res: the off j Sci Section Chin Stomatol Assoc (CSA). 2015;18(1):59–65.