Author:
Mukai Tomoko,Sato Yuji,Shimodaira Osamu,Furuya Junichi,Isobe Akio,Omori Tomoka
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Plate dentures cannot be easily modified after fabrication; therefore, the sites and magnitude of relief must be effectively assessed at the time of fabrication. However, a considerable variation exists in the magnitude of optimal relief and relief range, and there are no guidelines that present these clearly, leading the dentists to decide subjectively. Thus, this study aims to develop an optimal relief method to improve the stress bearing capacity of the palatal mucosa.
Methods
The objective of this study, namely, the borderline, was set in steps. A three-dimensional finite element model for the pseudopalatal plate was created and used to evaluate the changes in stress distribution in the palatal mucosa due to the selective relief of stresses above the borderline. The resulting data were used to develop the optimal relief method.
Results
In the relief model with a borderline of 0.04 MPa or higher, the distribution volume at which a high stress of 0.20 MPa or higher is generated was approximately 800% of that with the no-relief model, and in the relief model with a borderline of 0.06 MPa or higher, the respective ratio was approximately 280%. On the other hand, the relief models with a borderline of 0.14 MPa or higher were approximately 60%. In the mid-palatal relief model, the distribution volume at which a stress of 0.20 MPa or higher was generated was 180% of that in the relief model.
Conclusions
The supportive strength of plates can be increased by selectively applying optimal relief rather than standard relief, allowing for easier and more effective plate-denture treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Sato Y, et al. Estimation of denture patients’ absolute number in elderly from survey of dental diseases and vital statistics. Jpn J Dent Pract Admin. 2014;49:162–7 (in Japanese).
2. Tanaka S. Digital dentistry changes prosthodontics. J Showa Med Assoc. 2015;75:38–45 (in Japanese).
3. Hiraoka H. Clinical practice of the zirconia denture base. Int J Dent Technol. 2015;43:408–21.
4. Academy of denture prosthetics: glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10–81.
5. Masatoshi I, Misao K, Sayumi I, et al. Pressure dynamics in the trays caused by differences of the various impression materials and thickness of the relief in the maxillary edentulous model. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:123–30.