Author:
Taqi Muhammad,Zaidi Syed Jaffar Abbas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study is to assess the caries prediction of the reduced Cariogram by comparing baseline caries risk profiles with non-cavitated and cavitated lesions over periods of six, twelve, and 18 months.
Methods
From May 2016 to October 2017, seven schools in Bhakkar, Pakistan, participated in a cohort study. First base line examination was conducted followed by examinations at 6, 12 and 18 months. Children intraoral examinations were performed on portable dental chair with in school premises by a trained examiner. A modified ICDAS index was used to measure caries at baseline and at follow-up examinations after 6, 12, and 18-months. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate its effectiveness for predicting dental caries increment.
Results
About 40% of children had a low-risk status, 30.5% medium risk, and 29.7% high risk, at baseline risk assessment. At 18 months, 73% of high-risk children, 59% of medium-risk children, and 41% of low-risk children showed a caries increment. For the reduced Cariogram model, the area under the curve on the 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up was 0.63, 0.65 and 0.70 respectively.
Conclusions
Our findings indicates that a reduced Cariogram can predict the progression of caries in both cavitated and non-cavitated lesions and model exhibits a level of discriminatory ability. While it might not achieve a very high accuracy, it suggests that the model is able to predict caries increment effectively than random guessing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Ismail A, Tellez M, Pitts N, Ekstrand K, Ricketts D, Longbottom C, et al. Caries management pathways preserve dental tissues and promote oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(1):e12–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12024.
2. Tellez M, Gomez J, Pretty I, Ellwood R, Ismail AI. Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12003.
3. Bratthall D, Hänsel Petersson G, Stjernswärd JR. Cariogram Manual - a new and interactive way of illustrating the interaction of factors contributing to the development of dental caries. Internet Version 2.01. 2004.
4. Singh A, Singh RP, and Pawar A. Cariogram- A multifactorial risk assessment model for dental caries. Beau Bassin, Mauiritius: Lambert, 2018.
5. Petersson GH, Isberg P, Twetma S. Caries risk assessment in school children using a reduced Cariogram model without saliva tests. BMC Oral Health. 2010;10(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-10-5.