Author:
Taqi Muhammad,Razak Ishak Abdul,Ab-Murat Norintan,Zaidi Syed Jaffar Abbas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aims to investigate the rate of caries increment among 11-12-year-old Pakistani children over 18 months using modified International Caries Detection and Assessment Systems II (ICDAS) and subsequently establish an appropriate dental recall interval for our targeted population according to their caries risk intensity.
Methods
A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan. The 226 children from seven schools of Bhakkar with the highest student enrolment were conveniently selected. Caries risk assessment was performed using a computer-based reduced Cariogram program. Caries increment among cavitated lesions was measured by modified Beck's method or adjusted caries increment. Two ICDAS II cutoffs were created for the analysis of cavitated lesion (ICDAS code 3–6) and cavitated plus non-cavitated lesion (ICDAS code A-6).
Results
At the risk assessment stage, 39.8% of the children were classified as low risk, 30.5% as medium risk, and 29.7% as high risk. Caries increment at both cutoff points increased with caries risk at all follow-ups. The highest caries increment was recorded at the third follow-up among high-risk children at cutoff 3–6 (1.95 ± 3.18) and A-6 (4.01 ± 4.31). However, the lowest caries increment was recorded at the third follow-up among low-risk children at cutoff 3–6 (0.18 ± 1.42) and A-6 (1.11 ± 3.33).
Conclusion
Based on the study findings for Pakistani children with cavitated lesions, the recommended risk-based recall interval for caries management is 18 months for those with low and medium caries risk and six months for those with high caries risk. On the other hand, recommendations for risk-based recall intervals for caries management in non-cavitated and cavitated lesions are six months for low-risk, moderate risk and high-risk for Pakistani 11-12-year-old children.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. The Faculty of Dental Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. National clinical guidelines. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England; 1997.
2. Frame PS, Sawai R, Bowen WH, Meyerowitz C. Preventive dentistry: practitioners’ recommendations for low-risk patients compared with scientific evidence and practice guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:159–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00138-5.
3. Deep P. Screening for common oral diseases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66:298–9.
4. Boehmer U, Kressin NR, Spiro A, Garcia RI, Kazis L, Miller D, Randall CW, Jones JA. Oral health of ambulatory care patients. Mil Med. 2001;166:171–8.
5. Elley K, Gold L, Burls A, Gray M. Scale and polish for chronic periodontal disease. In: Birmingham: university of Birmingham, department of public health and epidemiology. West midlands development and evaluation service report, 2000; 22.