Author:
Zheng Chen,Wu Wenzhi,Zhang Yulian,Tang Zhenhang,Xie Zhijian,Chen Zhuo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
High technical thresholds, long operative times, and the need for expensive and specialized equipment impede the widespread adoption of endodontic microsurgery in many developing countries. This study aimed to compare the effects of a simplified, cost-effective, and time-efficient surgical approach involving orthograde obturation using biological ceramic material greater than 6 mm combined with apicoectomy for single-rooted teeth with short lengths with those of the conventional and current standard methods.
Materials and methods
Forty-five premolars equally categorized into three groups: conventional surgery group, standard surgery group, and modified surgery group. A µCT scan was used to calculate the volume of voids. A micro-leakage test and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were performed to assess the sealing effect. Additionally, four cases of chronic periapical periodontitis in the anterior region were selected, and the patients received either the modified approach or the standard surgery for endodontic microsurgery.
Results
The volumes of voids in the apical 0–3 mm of the modified group and the standard group were comparable. The micro-leakage test and SEM examination demonstrated closely bonded fillings in the dentinal walls in both the modified surgery group and standard surgery group. The outcomes of the preliminary application of this modified procedure on patients were successful at the time of the follow-up cutoff.
Conclusions
The modified surgery group exhibited similar root canal filling and apical sealing abilities with the standard procedure for single-rooted teeth with short lengths (< 20 mm). The preliminary application of this modified surgical procedure achieved favorable results.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
“Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang
R&D Program of the Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Bucchi C, Rosen E, Taschieri S. Non-surgical root canal treatment and retreatment versus apical surgery in treating apical periodontitis: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2022;56:1–12.
2. Von Arx T, Penarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36(6):957–73.
3. Floratos S, Kim S. Modern endodontic microsurgery concepts: a clinical update. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(1):81–91
4. Setzer FC, Shah SB, Kohli MR, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature—part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2010;36(11):1757–65.
5. Setzer FC, Kratchman SI. Present status and future directions: Surgical endodontics. Int Endod J. 2022;55: 1020–58.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献