Author:
Campbell Faith,Rogers Helen,Goldsmith Rachel,Rowles Kathryn,Raggio Daniela Prócida,Innes Nicola
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Current evidence in cariology teaching is not consistently reflected in paediatric dentistry in the United Kingdom (UK). Many dental schools are not consistently teaching biological approaches to caries management, with outdated or complex methods being taught outwith the purview of general dental practitioners. This scoping review aimed to map current guidelines on the management of caries in children and young people. This is part of a work package to inform the consensus and development of a UK-wide caries management curriculum for paediatric dentistry.
Methods
A search of electronic databases for peer reviewed literature was performed using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, TRIP Medical Database and Web of Science. Hand searching was undertaken for grey literature (citations of sources of evidence, websites of global organisations and Google Web Search™ (Google LLC, California, USA). Results from databases were screened independently, concurrently by two reviewers. Full texts were obtained, and reviewers met to discuss any disagreement for both database and hand searching.
Results
This review identified 16 guidelines suitable for inclusion. After quality appraisal, eight were selected for synthesis and interpretation. Key themes included the shift towards selective caries removal and avoidance of complete caries removal unless in specific circumstances in anterior teeth. For “early lesions” in primary and permanent teeth with and without cavitation, several guidelines recommend biological management including site specific prevention and fissure sealants.
Conclusions
This review mapping current cariology guidelines for children and young people found gaps in the literature including classification of early carious lesions and management of early cavitated lesions. Areas identified for further exploration include integration of biological caries management into treatment planning, selective caries removal and whether pulpotomy is specialist-level treatment, requiring referral. These results will inform consensus recommendations in the UK, using Delphi methods.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Schwendicke F, Walsh T, Lamont T, Al-Yaseen W, Bjørndal L, Clarkson JE, et al. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2021;2021:7.
2. Innes NPT, Schwendicke F. Restorative thresholds for Carious lesions: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2017;96(5):501–8.
3. Campbell F, Goldsmith R, Rogers HJ. Are we practicing what we preach and are we all singing from the same hymn sheet? An exploration of teaching in paediatric caries management across UK dental schools. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13181. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38590044.
4. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989).
5. Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Prevention and management of dental caries in children. 2018. https://www.sdcep.org.uk/media/2zbkrdkg/sdcep-prevention-and-management-of-dental-caries-in-children-2nd-edition.pdf. Accessed 25/01/2024.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Aktuelle Leitlinien zum Karies- management;Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin;2024-09