Author:
Alseddiek Ahmed,Alzordok Walid,Attia Ahmed
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of the current study was to assess the impact of three esthetic CAD/CAM material, titanium base height and their interaction on the retention strength of a hybrid-abutment-crown.
Methods
A total of 42 hybrid-abutment crowns with identical external geometries were designed in CAD software to fit two different Ti-Base abutment heights (n = 42/abutment height): either short (S) with 4 mm (n = 21) or long (L) 7 mm (n = 21) height. Each main group was divided into 3 subgroups (n = 7), according to esthetic crown material, Zirconia (Z), Lithium disilicate (L) and Hybrid ceramic (V). A universal primer and an adhesive resin cement were used for bonding according to the manufacturer instructions. Artificial aging in form of water storage (30 days), chewing simulation (50,000-cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz) and thermal cyclic (5000 cycles at 5–55 °C) were applied, specimens were pulled-out under tension load in (N) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
Long lithium disilicate (LL) group showed the highest retention (738.7 ± 178.5) followed by short lithium disilicate (LS) group (688.6 ± 169.9). Meanwhile, short zirconia (ZS) showed the lowest retention strength (231.1 ± 86.9).
Conclusion
CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate hybrid-abutment-crown can be used instead of conventional crowns over implant abutment. Etchable ceramics are recommended as a material of choice for CAD/CAM fabricated hybrid-abutment-crowns instead of zirconia in terms of retention durability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, ThomaDS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidenceof biological, technical, and esthetic compilcations ofsingle crowns on implans reported in longitudinal studieswith a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2012;23:2–21.
2. De Angelis P, Passarelli PC, Gasparini G, Boniello R, D’Amato G, De Angelis S. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: a 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:252–6.
3. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent., Oliveira D, Pereira JC, Gomes-Ferreira PHS, Kottwitz AB. Prosthetic resolution of malpositioned dental implants with5-year follow-up.
4. Oliveira D, Pereira JC, Gomes-Ferreira PHS, Kottwitz AB. Prosthetic resolution of malpositioned dental implants with 5-year follow-up.
5. Chung H, Park C, Yun K-D, Lim H-P, Park S-W, Yang H. Effects of implant alignment and load direction on mandibular bone and implant: finite element analysis. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2020;36:176–82.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献