Author:
Tan Rukeng,Zhu Xinyu,Chen Sishi,Zhang Jie,Liu Zhixin,Li Zhengshi,Fan Hang,Wang Xi,Yang Le
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study investigated the effectiveness of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in diagnosing and staging caries lesions in quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images taken by a self-manufactured handheld device.
Methods
A small toothbrush-like device consisting of a 400 nm UV light-emitting lamp with a 470 nm filter was manufactured for intraoral imaging. A total of 133 cases with 9,478 QLF images of teeth were included for caries lesion evaluation using a CNN model. The database was divided into development, validation, and testing cohorts at a 7:2:1 ratio. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for model performance.
Results
The overall caries prevalence was 19.59%. The CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.88, an accuracy of 0.88, a specificity of 0.94, and a sensitivity of 0.64 in the validation cohort. They achieved an overall accuracy of 0.92, a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.55 in the testing cohort. The model can distinguish different stages of caries well, with the best performance in detecting deep caries followed by intermediate and superficial lesions.
Conclusions
Caries lesions have typical characteristics in QLF images and can be detected by CNNs. A QLF-based device with CNNs can assist in caries screening in the clinic or at home.
Trial registration
The clinical trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2300073487, Date: 12/07/2023).
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Shivakumar K, Prasad S, Chandu G. International Caries Detection and Assessment System: a new paradigm in detection of dental caries. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12(1):10–6.
2. Janjic Rankovic M, Kapor S, Khazaei Y, Crispin A, Schüler I, Krause F, Ekstrand K, Michou S, Eggmann F, Lussi A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(11):6069–79.
3. Macey R, Walsh T, Riley P, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, O’Malley L, Clarkson JE, Ricketts D. Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(6):Cd014546.
4. Sardana D, Ekambaram M, Yang Y, McGrath CP, Yiu CKY. Caries-preventive effectiveness of two different fluoride varnishes: a randomised clinical trial in patients with multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic appliances. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023;33(1):50–62.
5. Liang JP. [Research and application of new techniques for early diagnosis of caries]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;56(1):33–8.