Author:
Manaspon Chawan,Jongwannasiri Chavin,Chumprasert Sujin,Sa-Ard-Iam Noppadol,Mahanonda Rangsini,Pavasant Prasit,Porntaveetus Thantrira,Osathanon Thanaphum
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Direct pulp capping is a vital pulp therapy for a pin-point dental pulp exposure. Applying a pulp capping material leads to the formation of a dentin bridge and protects pulp vitality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of four dental materials, DyCal®, ProRoot® MTA, Biodentine™, and TheraCal™ LC in vitro.
Methods
Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPs) were isolated and characterized. Extraction medium was prepared from the different pulp capping materials. The hDP cytotoxicity, proliferation, and migration were examined. The odonto/osteogenic differentiation was determined by alkaline phosphatase, Von Kossa, and alizarin red s staining. Osteogenic marker gene expression was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Results
ProRoot® MTA and Biodentine™ generated less cytotoxicity than DyCal® and TheraCal™ LC, which were highly toxic. The hDPs proliferated when cultured with the ProRoot® MTA and Biodentine™ extraction media. The ProRoot® MTA and Biodentine™ extraction medium induced greater cell attachment and spreading. Moreover, the hDPs cultured in the ProRoot® MTA or Biodentine™ extraction medium migrated in a similar manner to those in serum-free medium, while a marked reduction in cell migration was observed in the cells cultured in DyCal® and TheraCal™ LC extraction media. Improved mineralization was detected in hDPs maintained in ProRoot® MTA or Biodentine™ extraction medium compared with those in serum-free medium.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the favorable in vitro biocompatibility and bioactive properties of ProRoot® MTA and Biodentine™ on hDPs, suggesting their superior regenerative potential compared with DyCal® and TheraCal™.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Wells C, Dulong C, McCormack S. Vital pulp therapy for endodontic treatment of mature teeth: a review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health 2019 Jul. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546327/.
2. Goldberg M. Pulp healing and regeneration: more questions than answers. Adv Dent Res. 2011;23(3):270–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1172F0022034511405385.
3. Téclès O, Laurent P, Zygouritsas S, Burger A-S, Camps J, Dejou J. About I: activation of human dental pulp progenitor/stem cells in response to odontoblast injury. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50(2):103–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.1011.1009.
4. Shi S, Gronthos S. Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(4):696–704. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.1318.1354.1696.
5. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(25):13625–30. https://doi.org/10.11073/pnas.240309797.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献