Author:
He Jiabei,Jiang Lihua,Song Shaohua,Mo Shuixue
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between buccolingual inclination (BI) of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and non-cleft palate with skeletal Class III malocclusion. We propose a method of maxillary expansion which is more suitable for patients with CLP.
Methods
For this retrospective study, 40 patients with CLP and 21 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were selected. The CLP group was divided into the unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) groups. The BI of the maxillary first premolar (BI4), maxillary second premolar (BI5) and first molar (BI6) were measured using cone-beam computed tomography, and the differences between them were compared and analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Results
There were significant differences between cleft side BI4 and non-cleft side BI4 in the UCLP group, BI5 in the BCLP group, BI4 and BI5 in all CLP groups and the skeletal Class III malocclusion group. BI6 was similar across all three groups.
Conclusions
The premolars of patients with CLP do not exhibit the same regularity as those with Class III malocclusion; this may be related to surgical scarring of the cleft palate. Greater attention should be paid to the correction of BI in the maxillary expansion of patients with CLP.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Shi B, Losee JE. The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth. Int J Oral Sci. 2015;7(1):14–7.
2. Kuseler A, Molsted K, Marcusson A, Heliovaara A, Karsten A, Bellardie H, et al. Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: maxillary growth at eight years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(1):24–9.
3. Lin Y, Chen G, Fu Z, Ma L, Li W. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of lower facial asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients with class iii skeletal relationship. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0130235.
4. Luyten J, De Roo NMC, Christiaens J, Van Overberghe L, Temmerman L, De Pauw GAM. Rapid maxillary expansion vs slow maxillary expansion in patients with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2319/030122-188.1.
5. Singh H, Maurya RK, Sharma P, Kapoor P, Mittal T, Atri M. Effects of maxillary expansion on hearing and voice function in non-cleft lip palate and cleft lip palate patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;87(3):315–25.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献