Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Although apex locators are generally effective tools for determining root canal working length, they may produce inaccurate results in some cases. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography as an alternative method for measuring root canal length.
Materials and methods
Forty-seven anterior teeth with apical lesions were selected for the study. Initially, an electronic apex locator was used to measure the working length. Subsequently, ultrasonography was employed to visualize the root apex and determine the working length. During ultrasound imaging, a K-file No. 15 was inserted into the root canal until its tip was visible on the ultrasound monitor. Measurements obtained from both methods were compared using an independent sample t-test. Correlations were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and agreement was determined using the Bland‒Altman plot.
Results
The mean working canal length was 19.9 mm for the apex locator and 20.6 mm for the ultrasonography-guided method. No significant differences were observed between the data obtained using the apex locator method and the data obtained using the ultrasonography guidance method. Furthermore, a high level of agreement was identified between the two techniques.
Conclusion
Ultrasonography can be used to visualize the apex effectively and determine canal length, especially when canal length determination is uncertain for various reasons.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Martín-Micó M, Forner-Navarro L, Almenar-García A. Modification of the working length after rotary instrumentation: a comparative study of four systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14(3):E153–7. PMID: 19242397.
2. ElAyouti A, Dima E, Löst C. A tactile method for canal length determination in teeth with open apices. Int Endod J. 2009;42(12):1090–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01636.x
3. Khursheed I, Bansal R, Bansal T, Singh HP, Yadav M, Reddy KJ. A comparative evaluation of working length with digital radiography and third generation apex locator (ProPex) in the presence of various intracanal irrigants: an in vivo/ex vivo study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014;11(1):56–60. PMID: 24688561; PMCID: PMC3955316.
4. Seidberg BH, Alibrandi BV, Fine H, Logue B. Clinical investigation of measuring working lengths of root canals with an electronic device and with digital-tactile sense. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;90(2):379–87. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0059
5. Plotino G, Grande NM, Brigante L, Lesti B, Somma F. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex. Int Endod J. 2006;39(5):408–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01095.x