Author:
Šidlauskienė Monika,Šidlauskas Mantas,Šidlauskas Antanas,Juzėnas Simonas,Lopatienė Kristina
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The interplay between genetic and environmental impacts on dental and facial morphology has been widely analyzed, but little is known about their relative contributions to airway morphology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic and environmental influences on the cephalometric variables of airway morphology in a group of postpubertal twins with completed craniofacial growth.
Materials and methods
The materials comprised lateral head cephalograms of 94 pairs of twins (50 monozygotic, 44 dizygotic) with completed craniofacial growth. Zygosity was determined using 15 specific DNA markers. The computerized cephalometric analysis included 22 craniofacial, hyoideal, pharyngeal structural linear and angular variables. Genetic analysis and heritability estimation were performed using maximum likelihood genetic structural equation modeling (GSEM). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess the correlations between cephalometric measurement variables.
Results
Upper airway dimensions showed moderate to high genetic determination (SPPW-SPP and U-MPW: a2 = 0.64 and 0.5, respectively). Lower airway parameters showed only common and specific environmental determination (PPW-TPP a2 = 0.24, e2 = 0.38; LPW-V c2 = 0.2, e2 = 0.63; PCV-AH c2 = 0.47, e2 = 0.28). The relationship between the maxilla and the hyoid bone (for variables PNS-AH, ANS-AH d2 = 0.9, 0.92, respectively) showed very strong additive genetic determination. The size of the soft palate was affected by additive and dominant genes. Its length (SPL) was strongly influenced by dominant genes, while its width (SPW) showed a moderate additive genetic influence. Owing to correlations in the behavior of variables, the data could be expressed in 5 principal components that jointly explained 36.8% of the total variance.
Conclusions
The dimensions of the upper airway are strongly determined by genes, while the parameters of the lower airway depend mainly on environmental factors.
Trial registration
The protocol has been approved by the Kaunas Regional Ethical Committee (No. BE – 2–41., May 13, 2020).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Lin L, Zhao T, Qin D, Hua F, He H. The impact of mouth breathing on dentofacial development: A concise review.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep8;10:929165
2. Zhao T. Pediatric mouth breathing and malocclusion. Chin J Orthod. 2019;26:195–8.
3. Page DC, Mahony D, Todays FDA.2010 Mar-Apr;22(2):43–7.
4. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(3):460–8.
5. Linder-Aronson S, Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1970;265:1–132.