Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated whether increased attention to the central or peripheral visual field can reduce motion sickness in virtual reality (VR). A recent study found that increased attention to the periphery during vection was correlated with lower self-reported motion sickness susceptibility, which suggests that peripheral attention might be beneficial for avoiding cybersickness. We tested this experimentally by manipulating visual attention to central vs. peripheral fields during VR exposure. We also measured attention to the periphery during vection and motion sickness susceptibility to attempt to replicate the previous results. In Experiment 1, task-relevant cues to target locations were provided in the central or peripheral field during navigation in VR, and we found no differences in motion sickness. In Experiment 2, attention to the center or periphery was manipulated with a dot-probe task during passive VR exposure, and we found that motion sickness was greater in the condition that required attention to the periphery. In both experiments, there was no correlation between baseline attentional allocation and self-reported motion sickness susceptibility. Our results demonstrate that restricting attention to the central visual field can decrease cybersickness, which is consistent with previous findings that cybersickness is greater with large FOV.
Funder
Hong Kong Research Grants Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference27 articles.
1. Bos, J. E. (2015). Less sickness with more motion and/or mental distraction. Journal of Vestibular Research, 25(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-150541
2. Bos, J. E., MacKinnon, S., & Patterson, A. (2005). Motion sickness symptoms in a ship motion simulator: Effects of inside, outside and no view. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 76(12), 1111–1118.
3. Botella, J., Ximénez, C., Revuelta, J., & Suero, M. (2006). Optimization of sample size in controlled experiments: The CLAST rule. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192751
4. Brandt, T., Bartenstein, P., Janek, A., & Dieterich, M. (1998). Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 121(9), 1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.9.1749
5. Brandt, T., Glasauer, S., Stephan, T., Bense, S., Yousry, T. A., Deutschländer, A., & Dieterich, M. (2002). Visual-vestibular and visuo-visual cortical interaction: New insights from fMRI and PET. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 956(1), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02822.x
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献