Abstract
AbstractAlthough cognitive offloading, or the use of physical action to reduce internal cognitive demands, is a commonly used strategy in everyday life, relatively little is known about the conditions that encourage offloading and the memorial consequences of different offloading strategies for performance. Much of the extant work in this domain has focused on laboratory-based tasks consisting of word lists, letter strings, or numerical stimuli and thus makes little contact with real-world scenarios under which engaging in cognitive offloading might be likely. Accordingly, the current work examines offloading choice behavior and potential benefits afforded by offloading health-related information. Experiment 1 tests for internal memory performance for different pieces of missing medication interaction information. Experiment 2 tests internal memory and offloading under full offloading and partial offloading instructions for interaction outcomes that are relatively low severity (e.g., sweating). Experiment 3 extends Experiment 2 by testing offloading behavior and benefit in low-severity, medium-severity (e.g., backache), and high-severity interaction outcomes (e.g., heart attack). Here, we aimed to elucidate the potential benefits afforded by partial offloading and to examine whether there appears to be a preference for choosing to offload (i) difficult-to-remember information across outcomes that vary in severity, as well as (ii) information from more severe interaction outcomes. Results suggest that partial offloading benefits performance compared to relying on internal memory alone, but full offloading is more beneficial to performance than partial offloading.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference42 articles.
1. Anderson, J. L., Dodman, S., Kopelman, M., & Fleming, A. (1979). Patient information recall in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.18
2. Basden, D. R., & Basden, B. H. (1995). Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1656–1669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1656
3. Boldt, A., & Gilbert, S. J. (2019). Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0195-y
4. Brown, M. (2021). Enhancing short-term memory storage through cognitive offloading. California State University.
5. Burnett, L. K., & Richmond, L. L. (2022, April -10). Just write it down: Similarity in the use of and benefit from cognitive offloading in older and young adults [Poster session]. 2022 Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States.