Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification

Published:2018-03-14 Issue:1 Volume:3 Page:
ISSN:2365-7464
Container-title:Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
language:en
Short-container-title:Cogn. Research

Author:

Wixted John T.,Mickes Laura

Funder

NSF

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-018-0093-8/fulltext.html

Reference56 articles.

1. Amendola, K. L., & Wixted, J. T. (2015). Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of suspect identifications made by actual eyewitnesses from simultaneous and sequential lineups in a randomized field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 263–284.

2. Amendola, K. L., & Wixted, J. T. (2017). The role of site variance in the American Judicature Society field study comparing simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 1–19.

3. Andersen, S. M., Carlson, C. A., Carlson, M., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 36–40.

4. Cameron, E. L., Tai, J. C., Eckstein, M. P., & Carrasco, M. (2004). Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks—Identification, yes/no detection and localization. Spatial Vision, 17, 295–325.

5. Carlson, C. A., & Carlson, M. A. (2014). An evaluation of perpetrator distinctiveness, weapon presence, and lineup presentation using ROC analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.004 .

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Feeling the future of eyewitness research;Cognition;2024-10

2. Clarifying the effects of sequential item presentation in the police lineup task;Cognition;2024-09

3. Post‐collaborative benefits: A meta‐analysis of the effect of collaboration on subsequent individual retrieval;British Journal of Psychology;2024-07-23

4. The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition;2024-04-04

5. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching;Behavior Research Methods;2024-03-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3