Sound localization in noisy contexts: performance, metacognitive evaluations and head movements
-
Published:2024-01-08
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:
-
ISSN:2365-7464
-
Container-title:Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn. Research
Author:
Valzolgher ChiaraORCID, Capra Sara, Gessa Elena, Rosi Tommaso, Giovanelli Elena, Pavani Francesco
Abstract
AbstractLocalizing sounds in noisy environments can be challenging. Here, we reproduce real-life soundscapes to investigate the effects of environmental noise on sound localization experience. We evaluated participants' performance and metacognitive assessments, including measures of sound localization effort and confidence, while also tracking their spontaneous head movements. Normal-hearing participants (N = 30) were engaged in a speech-localization task conducted in three common soundscapes that progressively increased in complexity: nature, traffic, and a cocktail party setting. To control visual information and measure behaviors, we used visual virtual reality technology. The results revealed that the complexity of the soundscape had an impact on both performance errors and metacognitive evaluations. Participants reported increased effort and reduced confidence for sound localization in more complex noise environments. On the contrary, the level of soundscape complexity did not influence the use of spontaneous exploratory head-related behaviors. We also observed that, irrespective of the noisy condition, participants who implemented a higher number of head rotations and explored a wider extent of space by rotating their heads made lower localization errors. Interestingly, we found preliminary evidence that an increase in spontaneous head movements, specifically the extent of head rotation, leads to a decrease in perceived effort and an increase in confidence at the single-trial level. These findings expand previous observations regarding sound localization in noisy environments by broadening the perspective to also include metacognitive evaluations, exploratory behaviors and their interactions.
Funder
Velux Stiftung Italian Ministry for Research and University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference48 articles.
1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. arXiv preprint:1406, 5823. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01; 2. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1987). “Spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11(1), 61–75. 3. Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., & Kordik, A. J. (2005). Localization in the presence of multiple simultaneous sounds. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91(3), 471–479. 4. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229 5. Coudert, A., Gaveau, V., Gatel, J., Verdelet, G., Salemme, R., Farne, A., & Truy, E. (2022). Spatial hearing difficulties in reaching space in bilateral cochlear implant children improve with head movements. Ear and Hearing, 43(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001090
|
|