Abstract
AbstractThe present study examined whether scaling direction and perceptual modality affect children’s spatial scaling. Children aged 6–8 years (N = 201) were assigned to a visual, visuo-haptic, and haptic condition in which they were presented with colourful, embossed graphics. In the haptic condition, they were asked to wear a blindfold during the test trials. Across several trials, children were asked to learn about the position of a target in a map and to localize a disc at the same location in a referent space. Scaling factor was manipulated systematically, so that children had to either scale up or scale down spatial information. Their absolute deviations from the correct target location, reversal and signed errors, and response times served as dependent variables. Results revealed higher absolute deviations and response times for the haptic modality as opposed to the visual modality. Children’s signed errors, however, showed similar response strategies across the perceptual conditions. Therefore, it seems that a functional equivalence between vision and touch seems to emerge slowly across development for spatial scaling. With respect to scaling directions, findings showed that absolute deviations were affected by scaling factors, with symmetric increases in scaling up and scaling down in the haptic condition. Conversely, children showed an unbalanced pattern in the visual conditions, with higher accuracy in scaling down as opposed to scaling up. Overall, our findings suggest that visibility seems to factor into children’s scaling process.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
University of Basel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference49 articles.
1. Bedny, M., Richardson, H., & Saxe, R. (2015). “Visual” Cortex responds to spoken language in blind children. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0634-15.2015
2. Boyer, T. W., & Levine, S. C. (2012). Child proportional scaling: Is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001
3. Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2016). Review of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fifth edition: Critique, commentary, and independent analyses. In A. S. Kaufman, S. E. Raiford, & D. L. Coalson (Eds.), Intelligent testing with the WISC-V (pp. 683–702). Wiley.
4. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2009a). Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008009
5. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2009b). The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.910