Abstract
AbstractFrom infrared body temperature surveillance to lifeguarding, real-life visual search is usually continuous and comes with rare targets. Previous research has examined realistic search tasks involving separate slides (such as baggage screening and radiography), but search tasks that require continuous monitoring have generally received less attention. In this study, we investigated whether continuous visual search would display a target-rate effect similar to the low-prevalence effect (LPE) in regular visual search. We designed a continuous detection task for a target feature (e.g., a green color) among items of continuously and gradually changing features (e.g., other colors). In four experiments, we demonstrated target-rate effects in terms of slower hit response times (RTs) and higher miss rates when targets were rare. Similar to regular search, target-rate effects were also observed for relative frequencies across two target features. Taken together, these results suggest a target-rate effect in continuous visual search, and its behavioral characteristics are generally similar to those of the LPE in regular visual search.
Funder
Hong Kong Research Grants Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference37 articles.
1. Anderson, B. A. (2014). On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1755.
2. Colquhoun, W. V. (1961). The effect of ‘unwanted’ signals on performance in a vigilance task. Ergonomics, 4(1), 41–51.
3. Drury, C. G., Green, B. D., & Lin, J. F. (2007). Fatigue in aviation inspection: Laboratory and validation studies. In Contemporary ergonomics 2007 (pp. 41–46). Taylor & Francis.
4. Drury, C. (2015). Sustained attention in operational settings. In R. Hoffman, P. Hancock, M. Scerbo, R. Parasuraman, & J. Szalma (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of applied perception research (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology) (pp. 769–792). Cambridge University Press.
5. Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18(11), 943–947.