Social network support and harm reduction activities in a peer researcher-led pilot study, British Columbia, Canada
-
Published:2020-08-21
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:
-
ISSN:1477-7517
-
Container-title:Harm Reduction Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Harm Reduct J
Author:
Elkhalifa Sulaf, Jozaghi Ehsan, Marsh Samona, Thomson Erica, Gregg Delilah, Buxton Jane, Jolly AnnORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
People who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at high risk of both infectious disease and overdose. Harm reduction activities organized by their peers in the community can reduce risk by providing education, safer smoking supplies, and facilitate access to other services. Peers also provide a network of people who provide social support to PWSD which may reinforce harm reducing behaviors. We evaluated the numbers of supportive network members and the relationships between received support and participants’ harm-reducing activities.
Methods
Initial peer-researchers with past or current lived drug use experience were employed from communities in Abbotsford and Vancouver to interview ten friends from their social networks who use illegal drugs mainly through smoking. Contacts completed a questionnaire about people in their own harm reduction networks and their relationships with each other. We categorized social support into informational, emotional, and tangible aspects, and harm reduction into being trained in the use of, or carrying naloxone, assisting peers with overdoses, using brass screens to smoke, obtaining pipes from service organizations and being trained in CPR.
Results
Fifteen initial peer researchers interviewed 149 participants who provided information on up to 10 people who were friends or contacts and the relationships between them. People who smoked drugs in public were 1.46 (95% CI, 1.13-1.78) more likely to assist others with possible overdoses if they received tangible support; women who received tangible support were 1.24 (95% CI; 1.02-1.45) more likely to carry and be trained in the use of naloxone. There was no relationship between number of supportive network members and harm reduction behaviors.
Conclusions
In this pilot study, PWSD who received tangible support were more likely to assist peers in possible overdoses and be trained in the use of and/or carry naloxone, than those who did not receive tangible support. Future work on the social relationships of PWSD may prove valuable in the search for credible and effective interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. Aglipay M, Wylie J, Jolly A. Health research among hard to reach people: six degrees of sampling. Can Med Assoc J. 2015:1–5. 2. Belle D. Gender differences in the social moderators of stress. In: Barnett R, Biener L, Baruch GK, editors. Gender and Stress. New York: The Free Press; 1987. p. 257–75. 3. Bouchard M, Hashimi S, Tsai K, Lampkin H, Jozaghi E. Back to the core: a network approach to bolster harm reduction among persons who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;51:95–104. 4. Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Weakliem, D. L., Anthony, D. L., Madray, H., Mills, R. J., & Hughes, J. (1998). Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Reports, 113(5/10/2010), 42–57. 5. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|