Best interests and low thresholds: legal and ethical issues relating to needle and syringe services for under 18s in Sweden

Author:

Barrett DamonORCID,Petersson Frida,Turner Russell

Abstract

AbstractAccess for legal minors to needle and syringe programmes raises a number of practical, legal and ethical challenges that traverse clinical practice, child protection and child rights. This article addresses the current legal age restriction on access to needle and syringe programmes (NSPs) in Sweden. Based on legislation and legislative preparatory works, it traces the rationale for retaining an age restriction in the context of a policy priority to improve access for people who inject drugs. Building on threshold theory and child rights literature, the article unpacks the apparent tension between protecting the low threshold nature of service provision, child protection duties of healthcare staff, and the best interests of the child. It explores whether this tension could be alleviated through replacing a legal age restriction for all with best interests assessments for each individual, and discusses the potential ethical and practical challenges involved in such a change.

Funder

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd

University of Gothenburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. Alston P. The best interests principle: towards reconciliation of culture and human rights. Int J Law Fam. 1994;8(1):1–25.

2. Anderson E et al. Measuring statutory law and regulations for empirical research: a methods monograph for the public health law research program (PHLR), Temple University. 2012.

3. Archard D, Skivenes M. Balancing child’s best interests and child’s views. Int J Child Rights. 2009;17(1):1–22.

4. Barrett D, Hunt N, Stoicescu C. Injecting drug use among under-18s: a snapshot of available data. Harm Reduction International. 2013.

5. Barrett D, Tobin J. Article 33: protection from narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. In: Tobin J, editor. The UN convention on the rights of the child: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3