Author:
Cooper-Ohm Spencer,Habecker Patrick,Humeniuk Ryan,Bevins Rick A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The rising prevalence of fast-acting opioids in the USA suggests the increased need for non-professional first responder administration of naloxone. Effective administration of naloxone during an overdose requires that bystanders are familiar with, have access to, and know how to use naloxone.
Methods
Drawing on a statewide, address-based sample of Nebraskan adults, we used logistic regression to predict the likelihood of respondents’ familiarity with, access to, and competency to administer naloxone. Our independent variables included measures indicating proximity to drug use, perceived community stigma toward people who use drugs, and demographic data.
Results
There were significant gaps in naloxone knowledge in Nebraska. Although 74.8% of respondents were familiar with naloxone, only 18.2% knew how to access it and 18.0% knew how to use it. Being close to an overdose experience, lifetime illicit opioid use, being close to a person who uses opioids, and having access to illicit opioids were not significantly associated with naloxone familiarity, access, or competency among respondents in Nebraska’s two largest cities, Omaha and Lincoln. Outside of these cities, being close to a past overdose experience and access to illicit opioids was associated with higher odds of naloxone access and competency, but lifetime opioid use and being close to a person who uses opioids were not. Finally, among those familiar with naloxone, a higher perception of community stigma toward people who use opioids generally was associated with lower odds of naloxone access and competency. Higher perception of community stigma toward people who use heroin, methamphetamines, and cocaine, however, was associated with higher odds of naloxone access.
Conclusions
Our findings highlight the continued need for education on naloxone with a specific focus on access and competency to further reduce opioid-related overdose deaths. Specific focus should be placed on promoting naloxone knowledge among people with a higher likelihood of needing to administer naloxone to reduce otherwise avoidable deaths. Further work is needed to understand differences in the relationship between substance-specific perceived stigma and its association with naloxone access.
Funder
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 2023;10th edition. AAPOR.
2. Borders TF, Booth BM, Curran GM. African American cocaine users’ preferred treatment site: Variations by rural/urban residence, stigma, and treatment effectiveness. J Subst Abuse Treatment 2015;50:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.004
3. Bureau of Sociological Research. 2022 NASIS Methodology Report. 2022, https://bosr.unl.edu/NASIS%2022_Methodology%20Report_Final.pdf
4. Burton G, McAuley A, Schofield J, Yeung A, Matheson C, Parkes T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of take-home naloxone (THN) ownership and carriage. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;96: 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103298.
5. Dohrmann S, Han D, Mohadjer L. Residential address lists vs. traditional listing: Enumerating households and group quarters. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods, American Statistical Association, 2006, 2959–2964.