Author:
Sela Yaron,Hershkovich Oded,Sher-Lurie Nir,Schindler Amos,Givon Uri
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to analyze our experience in treating femoral shaft fractures with different strategies, focusing on the first year after injury when the choice of method would have the greatest impact.
Methods
We reviewed the medical records of all children treated for femoral shaft fractures in our institution between 1997 and 2010. They were divided according to therapeutic approach: spica cast, skin traction, titanium elastic nail (TEN), external fixator, intramedullary medullary nail (IMN), and plating.
Results
The 212 patients included 150 boys and 62 girls (M/F ratio 2.4:1, mean age 5 years, range 0–16). The postoperative radiographic results demonstrated solid union in all patients, with no malunions. Of the 151 children in the spica cast group, 10 required re-manipulation and casting due to loss of reduction with unaccepted angulation, 10 had contact dermatitis, and 2 had fever and pressure sores. All 21 elastic nail group children underwent re-operation to remove the hardware: 3 had soft tissue irritation at the insertion points, and 3 had leg length discrepancy (LLD). Of the 14 external fixation patients, 4 had LLD, 1 had a pin tract infection, and 1 had a fracture through a pinhole after a fall. There were no complications in the 12 IMN patients, the 3 plating patients, or the 11 skin traction patients. LLD rates in the spica group were 10.5% higher compared to those in the control group (other treatment modalities) (P = .03).
Conclusions
TEN treatment was superior to spica casting for children who had reached an average age of 4 years.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference24 articles.
1. Flynn JM, Schwend RM: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. JAAOS. 2004, 5: 348-359.
2. Hinton RY, Lincoln A, Crockett MM, Sponseller P, Smith G: Fractures of the femoral shaft in children: incidence, mechanisms, and sociodemographic risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999, 81: 500-509.
3. Blasier RD, Thompson GH, Rab GT: Hip, pelvis, and femur: pediatric aspects. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6: Home Study Syllabus. Edited by: Beaty JH. 1999, Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 409-425.
4. Carey TP, Galpin RD: Flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Clin Orthop. 1996, 332: 110-118.
5. Czertak DJ, Hennrikus WL: The treatment of pediatric femur fractures with early 90–90 spica casting. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999, 19: 229-232.