Investigating two mobile just-in-time adaptive interventions to foster psychological resilience: research protocol of the DynaM-INT study
-
Published:2023-08-25
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:
-
ISSN:2050-7283
-
Container-title:BMC Psychology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Psychol
Author:
Bögemann S. A.ORCID, Riepenhausen A., Puhlmann L. M. C., Bar S., Hermsen E. J. C., Mituniewicz J., Reppmann Z. C., Uściƚko A., van Leeuwen J. M. C., Wackerhagen C., Yuen K. S. L., Zerban M., Weermeijer J., Marciniak M. A., Mor N., van Kraaij A., Köber G., Pooseh S., Koval P., Arias-Vásquez A., Binder H., De Raedt W., Kleim B., Myin-Germeys I., Roelofs K., Timmer J., Tüscher O., Hendler T., Kobylińska D., Veer I. M., Kalisch R., Hermans E. J., Walter H.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Stress-related disorders such as anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and cause a tremendous burden for affected individuals and society. In order to improve prevention strategies, knowledge regarding resilience mechanisms and ways to boost them is highly needed. In the Dynamic Modelling of Resilience – interventional multicenter study (DynaM-INT), we will conduct a large-scale feasibility and preliminary efficacy test for two mobile- and wearable-based just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), designed to target putative resilience mechanisms. Deep participant phenotyping at baseline serves to identify individual predictors for intervention success in terms of target engagement and stress resilience.
Methods
DynaM-INT aims to recruit N = 250 healthy but vulnerable young adults in the transition phase between adolescence and adulthood (18–27 years) across five research sites (Berlin, Mainz, Nijmegen, Tel Aviv, and Warsaw). Participants are included if they report at least three negative burdensome past life events and show increased levels of internalizing symptoms while not being affected by any major mental disorder. Participants are characterized in a multimodal baseline phase, which includes neuropsychological tests, neuroimaging, bio-samples, sociodemographic and psychological questionnaires, a video-recorded interview, as well as ecological momentary assessments (EMA) and ecological physiological assessments (EPA).
Subsequently, participants are randomly assigned to one of two ecological momentary interventions (EMIs), targeting either positive cognitive reappraisal or reward sensitivity. During the following intervention phase, participants' stress responses are tracked using EMA and EPA, and JITAIs are triggered if an individually calibrated stress threshold is crossed. In a three-month-long follow-up phase, parts of the baseline characterization phase are repeated. Throughout the entire study, stressor exposure and mental health are regularly monitored to calculate stressor reactivity as a proxy for outcome resilience. The online monitoring questionnaires and the repetition of the baseline questionnaires also serve to assess target engagement.
Discussion
The DynaM-INT study intends to advance the field of resilience research by feasibility-testing two new mechanistically targeted JITAIs that aim at increasing individual stress resilience and identifying predictors for successful intervention response. Determining these predictors is an important step toward future randomized controlled trials to establish the efficacy of these interventions.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the Network for University Medicine State of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,General Medicine
Reference90 articles.
1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858. 2. Baxter AJ, Vos T, Scott KM, Ferrari AJ, Whiteford HA. The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychol Med. 2014;44:2363–74. 3. Liu Q, He H, Yang J, Feng X, Zhao F, Lyu J. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;126:134–40. 4. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen H-U, Jönsson B, Group on behalf of the C study, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:155–62. 5. Plana-Ripoll O, Momen NC, McGrath JJ, Wimberley T, Brikell I, Schendel D, et al. Temporal changes in sex- and age-specific incidence profiles of mental disorders—A nationwide study from 1970 to 2016. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022;145:604–14.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|