Author:
Nordstrand Andreas Espetvedt,Anyan Frederick,Bøe Hans Jakob,Hjemdal Odin,Noll Laura Katherine,Reichelt Jon Gerhard,Forbes David,Adler Amy B.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Problematic anger, characterized by excessive frequency, intensity, and duration of anger which causes substantial emotional distress and functional interference, poses a marked challenge in military populations. Despite its importance, research on this topic is limited. This study contributes to the literature by exploring problematic anger in a large sample of Norwegian military personnel who served in NATO missions in Afghanistan.
Methods
All Norwegian military personnel who deployed to Afghanistan between 2001 and 2020 were sent a link to a cross-sectional web-based survey by the Joint Medical Services of the Norwegian Armed Forces in 2020. A total of 6205 individuals (response rate: 67.7%) participated. The cross-sectional survey assessed problematic anger, mental and physical health, war zone stressor exposure, and quality of life.
Results
Overall, 8.4% of participants reported problematic anger. Mental health disorders, deployment-related shame and guilt, chronic pain, and challenges with the military-to-civilian transition were independently associated with problematic anger. Both staying in service and maintaining a part-time connection with the military as a reservist mitigated the risk of problematic anger after deployment, compared to complete separation from military service.
Conclusion
Findings demonstrate a sizeable prevalence of problematic anger among veterans of combat deployments. Given the associations between problematic anger and mental health disorders, chronic pain, and transition challenges, interventions designed to mitigate problematic anger need to be multi-faceted, including the possibility of maintaining an ongoing connection to military service. By reducing the risk of problematic anger, occupational, interpersonal and health outcomes may be improved for service members. Future research should examine the impact of problematic anger on adjustment over time, prevention strategies, and problematic anger in other high-risk occupations.
Funder
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference97 articles.
1. Aakvaag HF, Thoresen S, Wentzel-Larsen T, Dyb G, Røysamb E, Olff M. Broken and guilty since it happened: a population study of trauma-related shame and guilt after violence and sexual abuse. J Affect Disord. 2016;204:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.004.
2. Adler AB, LeardMann CA, Roenfeldt KA, Jacobson IG, Forbes D, Millennium Cohort Study Team. Magnitude of problematic anger and its predictors in the millennium cohort. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09206-2.
3. Adler AB, LeardMann CA, Villalobos J, Jacobson IG, Forbes D, Belding J, Millennium Cohort Study Team. Association of problematic anger with long-term adjustment following the military-to-civilian transition. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223236. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23236.
4. Anyan F, Hjemdal O. Loneliness in social relationships: mapping the nomological network of loneliness with key conceptual domains and theoretical constructs. J Soc Person Relat. 2022;39(2):132–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211033035.
5. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG, World Health Organization. &. (2001). AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary health care (No. WHO/MSD/MSB/01.6 a). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MSD-MSB-01.6a