Author:
Megías-Robles Alberto,Sánchez-López María T.,Gómez-Leal Raquel,Cabello Rosario,Gutiérrez-Cobo María José,Fernández-Berrocal Pablo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Better abilities in emotional intelligence (EI) have been linked to a decreased tendency to engage in health-related risk behaviour. However, the processes underlying this relationship are still unclear. The aim of this research was to examine the role of impulsivity and sensitivity to reward as mediating factors in the relationship between EI and health risk-taking.
Methods
Two hundred and fifty participants (Mage = 23.60, age range = 18–59; SD = 6.67; 71.60% women) were assessed on ability EI levels, risk-taking in health contexts, impulsivity, and sensitivity to reward. Unlike previous studies in the literature, we employed a performance-based ability measure to assess EI (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, MSCEIT).
Results
The results confirmed the negative relationship between EI and health risk-taking and revealed the existence of a significant negative indirect effect of EI on health-risk taking through various dimensions of impulsivity and sensitivity to reward. EI abilities —particularly the ability to manage emotions— were associated with lower levels of impulsivity under positive and negative emotional states, a better management of the tendency towards sensation seeking, and a decreased emotional reactivity to rewards.
Conclusions
The present research provides a better understanding of the processes underlying the negative relationship between EI and health risk-taking. Our findings suggest that having higher levels of EI abilities would allow for a more objective evaluation of risk scenarios and a more appropriate and safer decision making through its influence on the levels of impulsivity and emotional reactivity to rewards. Practical implications, limitations, and future lines of research are discussed.
Funder
Regional Ministry of Economy and Knowledge, Junta de Andalucía
Spanish Ministry of Education and Vocational Training
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,General Medicine
Reference71 articles.
1. Fischhoff B, Kadvany J. Risk: a very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
2. Schonberg T, Fox CR, Poldrack RA. Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):11–9.
3. Yates JF, Stone ER. The risk construct. In: Yates JF, editor. Wiley series in human performance and cognition risk-taking behavior. Oxford, England.: John Wiley; 1992. pp. 1–25.
4. Megías A, Navas JF, Petrova D, Cándido A, Maldonado A, Garcia-Retamero R, et al. Neural mechanisms underlying urgent and evaluative behaviors: an fMRI study on the interaction of automatic and controlled processes. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(8):2853–64.
5. Reyna VF. How people make decisions that involve risk. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004;13(2):60–6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献