Author:
Tong Kwok Kit,Chen Juliet Honglei,He Mu
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Social Axioms are generalized beliefs and broad assumptions about the world, guiding behaviors across various social situations. Social Axioms are usually assessed by Social Axioms Survey II (SAS II). Nevertheless, the length of the scale may limit its usefulness in studies with strict time constraint. The present study aimed at developing a shorter version.
Methods
A survey was conducted among 455 college students. First, we performed psychometric evaluation on the full item version of SAS II to identify items with superior psychometric properties for a brief version of SAS II. Second, we validated the psychometric properties of the brief version of SAS II.
Results
A 20-item version of SAS II (SAS II-20) was developed, and it demonstrated adequate reliability and validity. The correlations between SAS II-20 and personality variables, cognitive flexibility, interpersonal trust, locus of control, and paranormal beliefs were consistent with past studies.
Conclusions
SAS II-20 is psychometrically acceptable and provides a time-efficient measurement tool for investigating social beliefs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,General Medicine
Reference53 articles.
1. Leung K, Bond MH, De Carrasquel SR, Muñoz C, Hernández M, Murakami F, et al. Social axioms: the Search for Universal Dimensions of General Beliefs about how the World functions. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2002;33:286–302.
2. Bond MH, Leung K, Au A, Tong K, Chemonges-Nielson Z. Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. Eur J Personal. 2004;18:177–91.
3. Leung K, Bond MH, Schwartz SH. How to explain cross-cultural differences: values, valences, and expectancies. Asian J Psychol. 1995;1:70–5.
4. Leung K, Bond MH. Social axioms: a model for Social beliefs in Multicultural Perspective. Advances in experimental social psychology. Elsevier; 2004. 119–97.
5. Leung K, Zhou F. Values and Social axioms. Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. Elsevier; 2008. 471–90.