Author:
Aliyev Bakhtiyar,Rustamov Elnur,Satici Seydi Ahmet,Zalova Nuriyeva Ulkar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The WHO-5 Wellbeing Index is a widely used tool for assessing psychological well-being. Despite its global application, its adaptation and validation for the Azerbaijani population had not been previously explored. This study aims to fill this gap by adapting the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index for Azerbaijani adults and examining its relationship with psychological distress, resilience, and life satisfaction.
Methods
A sample of 875 Azerbaijani adults aged 18 to 89 (mean age = 29.13, SD = 10.98) participated in this study. The adaptation process included confirmatory factor analysis to test the original 5-item structure of the index in the Azerbaijani context. Additionally, item response theory analysis was employed to evaluate the discriminative values of the items. Reliability was assessed through various methods, including Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and Guttmann’s lambda.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original 5-item structure of the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index for the Azerbaijani sample, demonstrating alignment with the index’s original version. All items showed acceptable discriminative values in item response theory analysis. The index also exhibited sufficient reliability, as evidenced by Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and Guttmann’s lambda. Correlation and network analyses indicated significant associations of the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index with psychological distress, resilience, and life satisfaction. Specifically, the index was negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress, and positively correlated with resilience and life satisfaction.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index is a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychological well-being in the Azerbaijani population. Its significant associations with psychological distress, resilience, and life satisfaction further affirm its utility in this cultural context.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Rustamov E, Zalova Nuriyeva U, Allahverdiyeva M, Abbasov T, Mammadzada G, Rustamova N. Academic self-efficacy, academic procrastination, and well-being: a mediation model with a large sample of Azerbaijan. IOJPE. 2023;12(2):84–93.
2. Diener E. Assessing well-being: the collected works of Ed Diener, 331. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
3. Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being. 2009;1(2):137–64.
4. Myers D, Diener E. Who is happy? Psychol. Sci. 1995;6:1–19.
5. Ronen T, Hamama L, Rosenbaum M, Mishely-Yarlap A. Subjective well-being in adolescence: the role of Self-Control, Social Support, Age, gender, and Familial Crisis. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17:81–104.