Abstract
Abstract
Background
Geolocation apps have radically transformed dating practices around the world, with profound sociocultural implications. Few studies, however, have explored their addictive potential or factors that are associated with their misuse.
Objective
The present study aimed to assess the level of problematic Tinder use (PTU) in an adult sample, using a machine learning algorithm to determine, among 29 relevant variables, the most important predictors of PTU.
Methods
1,387 users of Tinder (18–74 years-old; male = 50.3%; female = 49.1%) completed an online questionnaire, and a machine learning tool was used to analyze their responses.
Results
On 5-point scale, participants’ mean PTU score was 1.91 (SD = 0.70), indicating a relatively low overall level of problematic app use. Among the most important predictors of Problematic use were the use of Tinder for enhancement (reduce boredom and increase positive emotions), coping with psychological problems, and increasing social connectedness. The number of “matches” (when two users show mutual interest), the number of online contacts on Tinder, and the number of resulting offline dates were also among the top predictors of PTU. Depressive mood and loneliness were among the middle-ranked predictors of PTU.
Conclusion
In accordance with the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution model of problematic internet use, the results suggest that PTU relates to how individual experience on the app interacts with dispositional and situational characteristics. However, variables that seemed to relate to PTU, including lack of self-esteem, negative mood states and loneliness, are not problems that online dating services as currently designed can be expected to resolve. This argues for increased digital services to identify and address potential problems helping drive the popularity of dating apps.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Potarca G. The demography of swiping right. An overview of couples who met through dating apps in Switzerland. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243733.
2. Rosenfeld MJ, Thomas RJ, Hausen S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. PNAS 2019;116(36):17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116.
3. Statista. Most popular dating apps worldwide as of May 2021, by number of monthly downloads (in 1,000s); 2022 Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1200234/most-popular-dating-apps-worldwide-by-number-of-downloads/.
4. Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW, Karney BR, Reis HAT, Sprecher S. Online dating: a critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;3(1):3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522.
5. Aretz W, Demuth I, Schmidt K, Vierlein J. Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of online-dating-service-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization. J Bus Media Psychol. 2010;1(1):8–16.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献