Abstract
Abstract
Background
There are hundreds of bikeshare programs worldwide, yet few health-related evaluations have been conducted. We enrolled a cohort of new bikeshare members in Philadelphia (Pennsylvania, USA) to assess whether within-person moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) increased with higher use of the program and whether effects differed for vulnerable sub-groups.
Methods
During 2015–2018, 1031 new members completed baseline and one-year follow-up online surveys regarding their personal characteristics and past 7-day MVPA minutes per week (minutes per week with- and without walking). Participants were linked to their bikeshare trips to objectively assess program use. Negative binomial (for continuous outcomes) and multinomial (for categorical outcomes) regression adjusted for person characteristics (socio-demographics, health), weather, biking-infrastructure, and baseline biking.
Results
Participant median age was 30, 25% were of Black or Latino race/ethnicity, and 30% were socioeconomically disadvantaged. By follow-up, personal bike ownership increased and 75% used bikeshare, although most used it infrequently. Per 10 day change in past year (PY) bikeshare use, non-walking MVPA min/wk increased 3% (roughly 6 min/wk, P < 0.014). More days of bikeshare was also associated with change from inactive to more active (odds ratio for ≥ 15 days in PY vs. no bikeshare use 1.80, CI 1.05–3.09, P < 0.03). Results were consistent across vulnerable sub-groups. In general, impacts on MVPA were similar when exposure was personal bike or bikeshare.
Conclusions
Bikeshare facilitated increases in cycling, slightly increased non-walking MVPA, and showed potential for activating inactive adults; however, for larger program impact, members will need to use it more frequently.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference62 articles.
1. Swisher AK. Yes, “exercise is medicine”….but it is so much more! Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2010;21(4):4–4.
2. Posadzki P, Pieper D, Bajpai R, Makaruk H, Könsgen N, Neuhaus AL, Semwal M. Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1724–1724.
3. Adult Physical Inactivity Prevalence Maps by Race/Ethnicity.Data from the website of National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service; Washington, DC. https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/data/inactivity-prevalence-maps/2015-2018.html. Accessed 1 Sept 2022.
4. Exercise or Physical Activity. Data on the website of National Center for Health Statistics, Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service; Hyattsville, MD. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/exercise.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2021.
5. Yang L, Hu L, Hipp JA, Imm KR, Schutte R, Stubbs B, Colditz GA, Smith L. Cross-sectional associations of active transport, employment status and objectively measured physical activity: analyses from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(9):764–9.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献