Non-mass enhancement on breast MRI: Clues to a more confident diagnosis

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-mass enhancement (NME) seen on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI) may be caused by benign, high risk or malignant lesions. Making a clear distinction between these lesions is challenging due to the significant overlap in their imaging appearance. Our study aims to assess the various patterns of distribution, internal enhancement patterns (IEPs) and kinetics of NME using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition with histopathologic correlation to aid in making a more confident recommendation regarding clinical management. Results Sixty-six female patients with NME on DCE-MRI were included. Thirty-four lesions (51.5%) were histopathologically proven to be benign and 32 (48.5%) were malignant. Segmental distribution was the most common pattern and was found in 22 cases (33.3%), 14 of them were malignant with p-value < 0.05. Linear distribution was reported in 14 cases, (21.2%), five of which were malignant, with p-value > 0.05. Thirteen cases (19.7%) had focal distribution, only two of them were malignant with p-value < 0.05. Twelve cases (18.2%) were of regional distribution, seven of which were malignant. Multiregional and diffuse distribution were the least common and were found in 3% and 4.5% of cases respectively. As for the enhancement pattern, 30 cases (45.5%) had heterogeneous enhancement. Nineteen of which were malignant with a p-value < 0.05. Clumped enhancement was found in 24 cases (36.4%); 12 cases were found to be malignant. Nine cases (13.6%) were of homogeneous enhancement, all of them were benign and three cases (4.5%) were of clustered ring enhancement with p-value > 0.05. Restricted diffusion value was detected in 75% of malignant cases with p-value < 0.05. In terms of kinetic curve, the most frequent curve was found to be type II plateau curve (26 cases, 39.4%), 15 cases were of benign pathology and the other 11 cases were proven to be malignant. Followed by type III washout curve which was detected in 25 cases (37.9%), 20 cases were malignant and five cases were benign. And type I persistent curve was found in 15 cases (22.7%); 14 cases were histopathologically proven to be benign, and only one case was of malignant pathology, with a total p-value < 0.05. Conclusions Our study found that the most common distribution pattern was segmental distribution, being statistically significant with p-value < 0.05, being more common among malignant lesions. As for the enhancement pattern, heterogeneous enhancement was the most common pattern, mainly detected in malignant lesions, with p-value < 0.05. The most common type of kinetic curve was type II curve.