Efficiency assessment of a two-stage diagnostic strategy combining CT angiography and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia: a simulation study

Author:

Iwata KunihiroORCID,Yanagisawa Akira,Ogasawara KatsuhikoORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background The importance of a diagnostic strategy combining coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT) for detecting myocardial ischemia is increasing. However, sensitivity and specificity alone may be insufficient to understand the efficiency characteristics of a diagnostic strategy combining CCTA and FFRCT (DSCCF). Our study aimed to evaluate the overall efficiency of DSCCF in detecting myocardial ischemia and compare it with other diagnostic strategies to determine whether evaluation by DSCCF is currently appropriate. Results This simulation study included 1000 patients with stable chest pain and suspected myocardial ischemia. Using a decision tree analysis, assuming a diagnostic strategy of adding FFRCT to CCTA-positive patients, we calculated the following efficiency parameters of DSCCF: (1) true positive (TP), false positive (FP), net false negative (FN), and net true negative (TN) test results; (2) net sensitivity; (3) net specificity; (4) positive predictive value; (5) negative predictive value; (6) post-test probability; (7) diagnostic accuracy; (8) diagnostic odds ratio; and (9) number needed to diagnose. We also calculated the efficiency parameters of other diagnostic strategies and compared them with those of DSCCF. In the basic setting, regarding efficiency parameters (1), the number of TPs, FPs, net FNs, and net TNs were 254, 69, 46, and 631, respectively. Efficiency parameters (2)–(9) were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.89), 0.90 (95% CI 0.88–0.92), 0.79 (95% CI 0.74–0.83), 0.93 (95% CI 0.91–0.95), 0.07 (95% CI 0.05–0.09), 0.89 (95% CI 0.86–0.90), 50.50 (95% CI 33.83–75.37), and 1.34 (95% CI 1.24–1.48), respectively. Compared with other diagnostic strategies, DSCCF had good efficiency parameters. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis did not reveal any evidence to contradict the findings in the basic setting. Conclusions This study demonstrated the diagnostic ability characteristics of DSCCF by assessing various efficiency parameters. Compared with other diagnostic strategies, DSCCF had good efficiency. In terms of efficiency, evaluation using DSCCF for detecting myocardial ischemia appears to be appropriate.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. Leber WA (2016) Is FFR-CT a “game changer” in the diagnostic management of stable coronary artery disease? Herz 41:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-016-4443-3

2. Ge Y, Pandya A, Steel K, Bingham S, Jerosch-Herold M, Chen YY, Mikolich JR, Arai AE, Bandettini WP, Patel AR, Farzaneh-Far A, Heitner JF, Shenoy C, Leung SW, Gonzalez JA, Shah DJ, Raman SV, Ferrari VA, Schulz-Menger J, Hachamovitch R, Stuber M, Simonetti OP, Kwong RY (2020) Cost-effectiveness analysis of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for stable chest pain syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1505–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.029

3. Parikh R, Patel A, Lu B, Senapati A, Mahmarian J, Chang SM (2020) Cardiac computed tomography for comprehensive coronary assessment: beyond diagnosis of anatomic stenosis. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 16:77–85. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-16-2-77

4. Bolognese L, Reccia MR (2022) Computed tomography to replace invasive coronary angiography? The DISCHARGE trial. Eur Heart J Suppl 24:I25–I28. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac067

5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ, Group ESCSD (2019) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3