Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several imaging modalities are available to assess complications post intestinal stoma creation. The aim of this study was the radiological assessment of intestinal complications pre-stomal closure using routine fluoroscopic water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE), combined CT-WSCE, and MRI-enema with rectal gel administration. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the potential alterations in the surgical management plan based on imaging findings.
Results
This prospective cross-sectional study recruited 130 patients with stomas referred for the assessment of stoma integrity. Thirty-six patients with stoma-related intestinal complications were included. Patients with complications were subdivided into 3 groups. Group A 15 patients with intestinal stomas referred for WSCE pre-stomal closure and complementary CT-WSCE evaluation was performed. Comparison between the detection of the complications by WSCE alone and combined CT-WSCE among group A was statistically significant (p = 0.008) yet the alteration of the surgical plan based on both modalities was not statistically significant (p = 0.063). Group B 11 patients with poor general conditions were referred directly for combined CT-WSCE assessment, complications diagnosed in this group: 6 (54.5%) intestinal obstruction, 2 (18.2%) pericolic collections, 2 (18.2%) abnormal fistula and 1 (9.1%) anastomotic leak. Group C 10 patients with intestinal stomas with malignant or inflammatory conditions referred directly for MRI-enema assessment, showed complications as follows: 3 (30%) colon/rectal tumoral recurrence, 2 (20%) strictures, 2 (20%) pericolic collections and 3 (30%) abnormal intestinal fistulous communications. Comparison between complicated colorectal cancer patients (20 patients) versus other complicated patients secondary to other surgical indications (16 patients) enrolled in the study from the 3 different groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.125).
Conclusions
Combined CT and WSCE is superior in the detection of intestinal fistulas, peri-colic collections, tumor recurrence, and para-stomal hernias than WSCE alone and might lead to a change of management. MRI after rectal gel administration can serve as reliable substitute in some patients for the detection of intestinal complications namely fistulas and tumor recurrence.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference16 articles.
1. Martin ST, Vogel JD (2012) Intestinal stomas: indications, management, and complications. Adv Surg 46(1):19–49
2. Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, Odeh SF, Möslein G, Zirngibl H (2018) Intestinal ostomy: classification, indications, ostomy care and complication management. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(11):182
3. Tonolini M (2019) A closer look at the stoma: multimodal imaging of patients with ileostomies and colostomies. Insights Imaging 10(1):1–15
4. Birgisson H, Påhlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B (2007) Late adverse effects of radiation therapy for rectal cancer–a systematic overview. Acta Oncol 46(4):504–516
5. Goh HL, Hawkins L, Kamarajah SK, Karandikar S, Goldstein M (2020) Is water-soluble contrast enema examination for integrity of rectal anastomosis necessary prior to ileostomy reversal? JGH Open 4(3):417–421