Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of mammographically detected asymmetric densities

Author:

Zidan Mohamed,Saad Shimaa Ali,Abo Elhamd Eman,Galal Hosam Eldin,Elkady Reem

Abstract

Abstract Background Asymmetric breast density is a potentially perplexing finding; it may be due to normal hormonal variation of the parenchymal pattern and summation artifact or it may indicate an underlying true pathology. The current study aimed to identify the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the assessment of breast asymmetries. Results Fifty breast lesions were detected corresponding to the mammographic asymmetry. There were 35 (70%) benign lesions and 15 (30%) malignant lesions. The mean ADC value was 1.59 ± 0.4 × 10–3 mm2/s for benign lesions and 0.82 ± 0.3 × 10–3 mm2/s for malignant lesions. The ADC cutoff value to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions was 1.10 × 10–3 mm2/s with sensitivity 80%, specificity 88.6%, positive predictive value 75%, negative predictive value 91%, and accuracy 86%. Best results were achieved by implementation of the combined DCE-MRI and DWI protocol, with sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value 87.5%, negative predictive value 97.1%, and accuracy 94%. Conclusion Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was the most sensitive method for the detection of the underlying malignant pathology of breast asymmetries. However, it provided a limited specificity that may cause improper final BIRADS classification and may increase the unnecessary invasive procedures. DWI was used as an adjunctive method to DCE-MRI that maintained high sensitivity and increased specificity and the overall diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI examination. Best results can be achieved by the combined protocol of DCE-MRI and DWI.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference22 articles.

1. Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Belmonte SJ, Gallagher W (1989) Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 1989(171):639–643

2. Samardar P, Shaw de Paredes E, Grimes MM, Wilson JD (2002) Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation. Radio-Graphics 2002(22):19–33

3. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2000(174):1769–1777

4. American College of Radiology (2013) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System® (BI-RADS®), 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston

5. Sickles EA. The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, and management. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45:765–771, v.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3