Usefulness of combined diffusion tensor imaging, arterial spin labelling and spectroscopic interictal analysis in refractory epilepsy

Abstract

Abstract Background Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder especially in pediatric population. Patients with non-lesional epilepsy have normal conventional MRI findings. In the recent era of advances in neuroimaging studies, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) can assess the tissue microstructure. Also, arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a noninvasive modality that evaluates cerebral blood flow. Multiple recent publications aimed at use of single or two new modalities in lateralization of epileptogenic focus in epilepsy, but the current study aimed to evaluate the added value of combined (DTI, ASL and MRS) in vivo localization of interactable epilepsy with negative conventional MRI findings. Results This prospective case control study was carried out in the period from January 1st, 2022 to October 1st, 2022 after approval of local ethical committee in our institution. Written informed consent was obtained from patients and healthy volunteers who were enrolled in this study. The current study included 46 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers as a control group. The mean age in the patient group was 22.3 ± 12.2 years, and in the control group, it was 23.8 ± 15.1 years. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was for spectroscopy (0.913), the difference in NAA/Cr showed sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 90%, while NAA/Cho + Cr showed a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 88%, the difference in rCBF showed an AUC of 0.89, with a cutoff value of 3.815 had a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 85%. As regards DTI, the changes in DTI parameters show sensitivity of 79.6% and a specificity of 80% in lateralization of the epileptic focus. The difference in FA only showed an AUC of 0.86, with a cutoff value of 0.01 had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 75% and the difference in MD only showed an AUC of 0.771, with a cutoff value of 0.545 had a sensitivity of 67.4% and a specificity of 70%. The diagnostic performance of MRS in terms of the AUC was significantly higher than ASL parameters (difference in NAA/Cr, p = 0.033 and difference in NAA/Cho + Cr, p = 0.044), and MD (p = 0.02). No other statistically significant differences were shown between the studied parameters. When the three methods were combined, all patients’ epileptogenic foci were correctly localized and lateralized. Conclusions Combining ASL, DTI and H-MRS provided excellent diagnostic performance in localization and lateralization of the epileptogenic focus. If this combination is not applicable in clinical practice, ASL could provide a considerably accurate and feasible method in this context. The present study supported the value of the new noninvasive MRI techniques in the elaboration of hidden brain pathology.