Abstract
Abstract
Background
Gnetales have a key phylogenetic position in the evolution of seed plants. Among the Gnetales, there is an extraordinary morphological diversity of seeds, the genus Ephedra, in particular, exhibits fleshy, coriaceous or winged (dry) seeds. Despite this striking diversity, its underlying genetic mechanisms remain poorly understood due to the limited studies in gymnosperms. Expanding the genomic and developmental data from gymnosperms contributes to a better understanding of seed evolution and development.
Results
We performed transcriptome analyses on different plant tissues of two Ephedra species with different seed morphologies. Anatomical observations in early developing ovules, show that differences in the seed morphologies are established early in their development. The transcriptomic analyses in dry-seeded Ephedra californica and fleshy-seeded Ephedra antisyphilitica, allowed us to identify the major differences between the differentially expressed genes in these species. We detected several genes known to be involved in fruit ripening as upregulated in the fleshy seed of Ephedra antisyphilitica.
Conclusions
This study allowed us to determine the differentially expressed genes involved in seed development of two Ephedra species. Furthermore, the results of this study of seeds with the enigmatic morphology in Ephedra californica and Ephedra antisyphilitica, allowed us to corroborate the hypothesis which suggest that the extra envelopes covering the seeds of Gnetales are not genetically similar to integument. Our results highlight the importance of carrying out studies on less explored species such as gymnosperms, to gain a better understanding of the evolutionary history of plants.
Funder
Eppley Foundation for Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental Biology,Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference105 articles.
1. Stapf O. Die Arten der Gattung Ephedra. KK Hof-und Staatsdruckerei. Wien: In Commission bei F. Tempsky; 1889.
2. Ickert-Bond SM, Skvarla JJ, Chissoe WF. Pollen dimorphism in Ephedra L. (Ephedraceae). Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2003;124(3–4):325–34.
3. Ickert-Bond SM, Renner SS. The Gnetales: recent insights on their morphology, reproductive biology, chromosome numbers, biogeography, and divergence times. J Syst Evol. 2016;54(1):1–16.
4. Eames AJ. Relationships of the Ephedrales. Phytomorphology. 1952;2:79–100.
5. Kramer KU, Green PS, Kubitzki K. The families and genera of vascular plants. In: Kramer KS, Green PS, editors. V.1: Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Berlin: Springer; 1990.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献