Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to improve the image quality (IQ) of sparse-view computed tomography (CT) images using a U-Net for lung metastasis detection and determine the best tradeoff between number of views, IQ, and diagnostic confidence.
Methods
CT images from 41 subjects aged 62.8 ± 10.6 years (mean ± standard deviation, 23 men), 34 with lung metastasis, 7 healthy, were retrospectively selected (2016–2018) and forward projected onto 2,048-view sinograms. Six corresponding sparse-view CT data subsets at varying levels of undersampling were reconstructed from sinograms using filtered backprojection with 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 views. A dual-frame U-Net was trained and evaluated for each subsampling level on 8,658 images from 22 diseased subjects. A representative image per scan was selected from 19 subjects (12 diseased, 7 healthy) for a single-blinded multireader study. These slices, for all levels of subsampling, with and without U-Net postprocessing, were presented to three readers. IQ and diagnostic confidence were ranked using predefined scales. Subjective nodule segmentation was evaluated using sensitivity and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); clustered Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used.
Results
The 64-projection sparse-view images resulted in 0.89 sensitivity and 0.81 DSC, while their counterparts, postprocessed with the U-Net, had improved metrics (0.94 sensitivity and 0.85 DSC) (p = 0.400). Fewer views led to insufficient IQ for diagnosis. For increased views, no substantial discrepancies were noted between sparse-view and postprocessed images.
Conclusions
Projection views can be reduced from 2,048 to 64 while maintaining IQ and the confidence of the radiologists on a satisfactory level.
Relevance statement
Our reader study demonstrates the benefit of U-Net postprocessing for regular CT screenings of patients with lung metastasis to increase the IQ and diagnostic confidence while reducing the dose.
Key points
• Sparse-projection-view streak artifacts reduce the quality and usability of sparse-view CT images.
• U-Net-based postprocessing removes sparse-view artifacts while maintaining diagnostically accurate IQ.
• Postprocessed sparse-view CTs drastically increase radiologists’ confidence in diagnosing lung metastasis.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Institute for Advanced Study, Technische Universität München
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2022) Cancer. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer. Accessed 10 Feb 2023
2. World Cancer Research Fund International (2022) Lung cancer. Available at: https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/lung-cancer-statistics/. Accessed 20 Mar 2023
3. Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister e.V. und Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten im Robert Koch-Institut (2018) Krebs in Deutschland. Available at: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2021/kid_2021_c33_c34_lunge.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 10 Feb 2023
4. American Cancer Society (2023) Lung cancer. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/lung-cancer.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2023
5. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (2013) Lungenkrebs / Lungenkarzinom. Available at: https://www.krebsgesellschaft.de/onko-internetportal/basis-informationen-krebs/krebsarten/lungenkrebs.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2023