Abstract
Abstract
Background
The intricate three-dimensional anatomy of the inner ear presents significant challenges in diagnostic procedures and critical surgical interventions. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNN), have shown promise for segmenting specific structures in medical imaging. This study aimed to train and externally validate an open-source U-net DL general model for automated segmentation of the inner ear from computed tomography (CT) scans, using quantitative and qualitative assessments.
Methods
In this multicenter study, we retrospectively collected a dataset of 271 CT scans to train an open-source U-net CNN model. An external set of 70 CT scans was used to evaluate the performance of the trained model. The model’s efficacy was quantitatively assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and qualitatively assessed using a 4-level Likert score. For comparative analysis, manual segmentation served as the reference standard, with assessments made on both training and validation datasets, as well as stratified analysis of normal and pathological subgroups.
Results
The optimized model yielded a mean DSC of 0.83 and achieved a Likert score of 1 in 42% of the cases, in conjunction with a significantly reduced processing time. Nevertheless, 27% of the patients received an indeterminate Likert score of 4. Overall, the mean DSCs were notably higher in the validation dataset than in the training dataset.
Conclusion
This study supports the external validation of an open-source U-net model for the automated segmentation of the inner ear from CT scans.
Relevance statement
This study optimized and assessed an open-source general deep learning model for automated segmentation of the inner ear using temporal CT scans, offering perspectives for application in clinical routine. The model weights, study datasets, and baseline model are worldwide accessible.
Key Points
A general open-source deep learning model was trained for CT automated inner ear segmentation.
The Dice similarity coefficient was 0.83 and a Likert score of 1 was attributed to 42% of automated segmentations.
The influence of scanning protocols on the model performances remains to be assessed.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC